Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/computer-use-agentsnpx skills add bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit --skill computer-use-agentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00048 | $0.02177 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01089 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00435 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
computer-use-agents scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
subprocess.run(["scrot", "/tmp/screenshot.png"]) This is a copy
92% identical to computer-use-agents — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 320 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Computer Use Agents
Patterns
Perception-Reasoning-Action Loop
The fundamental architecture of computer use agents: observe screen, reason about next action, execute action, repeat. This loop integrates vision models with action execution through an iterative pipeline.
Key components:
- PERCEPTION: Screenshot captures current screen state
- REASONING: Vision-language model analyzes and plans
- ACTION: Execute mouse/keyboard operations
- FEEDBACK: Observe result, continue or correct
Critical insight: Vision agents are completely still during "thinking" phase (1-5 seconds), creating a detectable pause pattern.
When to use: ['Building any computer use agent from scratch', 'Integrating vision models with desktop control', 'Understanding agent behavior patterns']
from anthropic import Anthropic
from PIL import Image
import base64
import pyautogui
import time
class ComputerUseAgent:
"""
Perception-Reasoning-Action loop implementation.
Based on Anthropic Computer Use patterns.
"""
def __init__(self, client: Anthropic, model: str = "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"):
self.client = client
self.model = model
self.max_steps = 50 # Prevent runaway loops
self.action_delay = 0.5 # Seconds between actions
def capture_screenshot(self) -> str:
"""Capture screen and return base64 encoded image."""
screenshot = pyautogui.screenshot()
# Resize for token efficiency (1280x800 is good balance)
screenshot = screenshot.resize((1280, 800), Image.LANCZOS)
import io
buffer = io.BytesIO()
screenshot.save(buffer, format="PNG")
return base64.b64encode(buffer.getvalue()).decode()
def execute_action(self, action: dict) -> dict:
"""Execute mouse/keyboard action on the computer."""
action_type = action.get("type")
if action_type == "click":
x, y = action["x"], action["y"]
button = action.get("button", "left")
pyautogui.click(x, y, button=button)
return {"success": True, "action": f"clicked at ({x}, {y})"}
elif action_type == "type":
text = action["text"]
pyautogui.typewrite(text, interval=0.02)
return {"success": True, "action": f"typed {len(text)} chars"}
elif action_type == "key":
key = action["key"]
pyautogui.press(key)
return {"success": True, "action": f"pressed {key}"}
elif action_type == "scroll":
direction = action.get("direction", "down")
amount = action.get("amount", 3)
scroll = -amount if direction == "down" else amount
pyautogui.scroll(scroll)
return {"success": True, "action": f"scrolled {dir
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 320 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 22b639051959
computer-use-agents is a skill published in the GitHub repository bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 2,177 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 92% identical to computer-use-agents, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.