deep-research

A workflow for asking Gemini Deep Research to investigate a topic using many current sources. Gemini is an AI service, and Deep Research is its mode for carrying out multi-step online research.

In plain words
What is it for?
Market research, competitor analysis, due diligence, literature reviews, historical investigations, and other research tasks requiring information from many sources.
Why use it?
It helps with questions that need broad, up-to-date evidence rather than a quick lookup. The workflow structures the request before sending it for research.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cdeistopened/skill-stack/deep-research
Any agent
npx skills add cdeistopened/skill-stack --skill deep-research
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cdeistopened/skill-stack

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 60 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,513 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00060 $0.01513
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00757
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00303
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00151

Measured 2d ago against content hash d132b8c86e3c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

deep-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

public/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md · 156 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Gemini Deep Research

Delegate deep, multi-source research to Gemini's Deep Research agent. This skill optimizes the user's research question into a structured prompt, fires it off via the Interactions API, and returns the full report.

When to Use

  • Market research, competitive analysis, due diligence
  • Literature reviews, state-of-the-art surveys
  • Historical deep dives on people, movements, or ideas
  • "What does the current landscape look like for X?"
  • Any question that benefits from searching 50-100+ web sources
  • When the user explicitly asks for "deep research" or wants comprehensive analysis

When NOT to Use

  • Quick factual lookups (use WebSearch instead)
  • Code questions or debugging
  • Tasks requiring real-time interaction or low latency
  • Questions about the user's local codebase

Workflow

Phase 1: Optimize the Research Prompt

Before sending to Gemini, transform the user's raw request into a well-structured research prompt. This is critical — Deep Research quality scales with prompt quality.

Prompt optimization checklist:

  1. Scope the question clearly — What specifically should be researched? Add boundaries (time period, geography, industry, etc.)
  2. Define the output structure — Tell Gemini exactly what sections/format you want
  3. Specify depth expectations — "Include specific examples," "cite primary sources," "compare at least 5 competitors"
  4. Add anti-hallucination guardrails — "Only include claims with verifiable sources," "distinguish between confirmed facts and speculation"
  5. Request citations — "Include source URLs for all major claims"

Template for optimized prompts:

Research [TOPIC] with the following scope and structure:

## Scope
[Boundaries: time period, geography, domain, exclusions]

## Required Sections
1. [Section with specific instructions]
2. [Section with specific instructions]
3. [Section with specific instructions]

## Output Requirements
- Include source URLs for all major claims
- Distinguish between confirmed facts and projections/speculation
- Include a summary table comparing [key dimensions]
- Target depth: [comprehensive / focused overview / executive summary]

Read the full file on GitHub · 156 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 156 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A d132b8c86e3c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

deep-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository cdeistopened/skill-stack (27 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,513 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens