Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/codelably/harmony-claude-code/tdd-workflownpx skills add codelably/harmony-claude-code --skill tdd-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/codelably/harmony-claude-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.02945 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01473 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00295 |
Grade A, and why
tdd-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 410 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
測試驅動開發工作流程
此技能確保所有程式碼開發遵循 TDD 原則,並具有完整的測試覆蓋率。
何時啟用
- 撰寫新功能或功能性程式碼
- 修復 Bug 或問題
- 重構現有程式碼
- 新增 API 端點
- 建立新元件
核心原則
1. 測試先於程式碼
總是先寫測試,然後實作程式碼使測試通過。
2. 覆蓋率要求
- 最低 80% 覆蓋率(單元 + 整合 + E2E)
- 涵蓋所有邊界案例
- 測試錯誤情境
- 驗證邊界條件
3. 測試類型
單元測試
- 個別函式和工具
- 元件邏輯
- 純函式
- 輔助函式和工具
整合測試
- API 端點
- 資料庫操作
- 服務互動
- 外部 API 呼叫
E2E 測試(Playwright)
- 關鍵使用者流程
- 完整工作流程
- 瀏覽器自動化
- UI 互動
TDD 工作流程步驟
步驟 1:撰寫使用者旅程
身為 [角色],我想要 [動作],以便 [好處]
範例:
身為使用者,我想要語意搜尋市場,
以便即使沒有精確關鍵字也能找到相關市場。
步驟 2:產生測試案例
為每個使用者旅程建立完整的測試案例:
describe('Semantic Search', () => {
it('returns relevant markets for query', async () => {
// 測試實作
})
it('handles empty query gracefully', async () => {
// 測試邊界案例
})
it('falls back to substring search when Redis unavailable', async () => {
// 測試回退行為
})
it('sorts results by similarity score', async () => {
// 測試排序邏輯
})
})
步驟 3:執行測試(應該失敗)
npm test
# 測試應該失敗 - 我們還沒實作
步驟 4:實作程式碼
撰寫最少的程式碼使測試通過:
// 由測試引導的實作
export async function searchMarkets(query: string) {
// 實作在此
}
步驟 5:再次執行測試
npm test
# 測試現在應該通過
步驟 6:重構
在保持測試通過的同時改善程式碼品質:
- 移除重複
- 改善命名
- 優化效能
- 增強可讀性
步驟 7:驗證覆蓋率
npm run test:coverage
# 驗證達到 80%+ 覆蓋率
測試模式
單元測試模式(Jest/Vitest)
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import { Button } from './Button'
describe('Button Component', () => {
it('renders with correct text', () => {
render(<Button>Click me</Button>)
expect(screen.getByText('Click me')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('calls onClick when clicked', () => {
const handleClick = jest.fn()
render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click</Button>)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('is disabled when disabled prop is true', () => {
render(<Button disabled>Click</Button>)
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})
})
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 410 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 67b7874a9a54
tdd-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository codelably/harmony-claude-code (42 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 2,945 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…