Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/contentstack/contentstack-agent-skills/cms-workflowsnpx skills add contentstack/contentstack-agent-skills --skill cms-workflowsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/contentstack/contentstack-agent-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00986 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00493 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00197 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
cms-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
cms-workflows
Workflows & Publish Rules
Description
Advise developers on designing and configuring Contentstack workflows and publish rules for content governance. Cover stage design, transition restrictions, approval flows, publish governance, automation hooks, and common pitfalls.
When to Use
Use when developers ask about workflow stage design, approval processes, publish rules, self-approval prevention, transition restrictions, or automation triggered by workflow changes.
User Problem
Developers need to design content governance flows that match their review process without adding unnecessary complexity or creating permission gaps.
Success Criteria
Recommend the simplest workflow that satisfies the business requirement. Explain how stages, transitions, approvals, and publish rules differ. Call out limits, scope, and permission constraints clearly. Warn against over-engineering and unsupported assumptions. Suggest integration patterns when automation is needed.
Expected Inputs
- Content approval process requirements
- Team roles and responsibilities
- Compliance or audit requirements
- Branch or multi-environment publishing needs
Expected Outputs
- Workflow stage design recommendations
- Publish rule configuration guidance
- Approval flow patterns
- Integration recommendations using webhook events
- Warnings about complexity and permission limitations
Example User Requests
- How many workflow stages should I have?
- How do I prevent an author from approving their own content?
- How do publish rules differ from workflows?
- Can I automate actions when content reaches a workflow stage?
- How do workflows work across branches?
Workflow Summary
Understand the approval process and team structure. Design the simplest workflow that meets the requirement. Add publish rules only when additional governance is needed. Describe integration points for automation and auditability. Warn about complexity, scope, and permission limitations.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 130 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ddab6870641e
cms-workflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository contentstack/contentstack-agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 986 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…