Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/crewplaneai/crewplane/create-workflowsnpx skills add crewplaneai/crewplane --skill create-workflowsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/crewplaneai/crewplaneWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00091 | $0.06391 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.03195 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00639 |
Grade A, and why
create-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 710 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Workflows
Goal
Create self-contained .task.md workflows that coordinate independent AI
provider invocations through explicit files and artifacts. Treat workflow files
as infrastructure: declarative, reviewable, deterministic to validate, and
portable across projects that use the same workflow format.
Authoring Workflow
-
Inspect the target project before writing.
- Find existing
.task.mdworkflows and the workflow schema version if they exist. - Reuse provider IDs supplied by the user, already present in existing
workflows, or configured in the target project. If none are available, use
clear placeholders such as
planner,builder, andreviewerand call out that the user must replace them. - Do not create or modify provider setup or other non-workflow files.
- Keep the workflow independent of the skill location and do not reference implementation source files as required context.
- Find existing
-
Define the graph before writing prompts.
- State the workflow goal, final deliverable, and validation gate.
- Split work into nodes with explicit ownership and artifact handoff.
- Add
needsonly where data or ordering is required. Independent roots should stay parallelizable. - Use upstream artifacts for handoff; do not assume providers share memory, sessions, or hidden state.
- Keep each node's context bounded. Prefer artifact paths, concise findings, or exact file references over repeatedly inlining large upstream outputs.
- For research, planning, and design work whose complete result matters to a
dependent node, pass
{{upstream.output_path}}and tell the consumer to open it. Do not reduce the canonical handoff to findings and risk losing detail.
-
Choose node modes conservatively.
- Use
mode: parallelfor a normal one-shot invocation with one provider, or when multiple executor providers can run the same prompt independently and their outputs can be consolidated afterward. - Keep multi-provider parallel tasks and independent DAG roots read-only unless
concurrent mutations are provably disjoint. Add
needsedges to serialize nodes that may edit the same project files. - Use single-provider
mode: sequentialonly for ordered repeated passes. Itsdepthis the total invocation count, and one pass's Markdown output is not automatically injected into the next pass. Omitteddepthmeans one pass. - Use multi-provider
mode: sequentialfor executor/reviewer loops. - Use
mode: inputfor reusable raw-file boundaries. Input nodes have no Markdown body section. An input that remains in the composed workflow must havesource; an import-required input may omit it when an importer binds it. - Keep DAG concurrency distinct from node mode: independent ready nodes can run concurrently even when each node is sequential.
- Use
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 710 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 69e98efd345d
create-workflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository crewplaneai/crewplane (35 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 6,391 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
arch-check
架构与实现审查 —— 基于「概念建模 → 职责划分 → 机制/策略分离 → 因果与不变量 → 属性建模 → 模块化 → SOLID → GRASP → YAGNI」的全维度审查,带置信度门控与假阳性抑制(对抗"过度工程建议"这类 AI slop)。触发于:要求 review/审查架构、检查目录结构/依赖关系/职责划分、重构前评估、技术债盘点、判断是否过度设计,或问「这个设计合理吗 / 该怎么拆 / 有没有循环依赖 / 这个改动架构上 OK 吗」。一律按最高强度审查。用法:arch-check [范围] [--fix|--plan]。范围可为目录/文件/PR;缺省审当前分支相对基线的全部变更。.
e2e
Selects and runs the appropriate AgentsMesh end-to-end suite for Web, Desktop, MCP, or iOS, including worktree-specific environment setup and browser-level verification. Use when a change needs E2E coverage, a user asks to execute or diagnose an E2E test, or a cross-service workflow must be verified against the real…
gh-merge
Completes the AgentsMesh GitHub pull-request workflow: commits scoped changes, rebases on the authoritative GitHub branch, opens or reuses a PR, monitors required checks, fixes failures, and merges only after verification. Use when the user asks to merge, submit, or land repository changes.
github-gitlab-mirror
Audits or synchronizes the authoritative GitHub main branch to the internal GitLab mirror without importing GitLab-only history back into GitHub. Use when checking GitHub/GitLab consistency, updating the internal mirror, or resolving a divergence between the two remotes.
worktree
Creates or reuses an isolated AgentsMesh Git worktree from a verified base branch, preserves existing changes, and optionally starts the worktree-scoped development environment. Use when the user asks for a new worktree or isolated work for a feature, fix, investigation, or review.
autoprompt
Explicit-only useful-first orchestration. Invoke only when the user names autoprompt - typed as /autoprompt or in plain language such as "act in autoprompt mode" - to turn a mission into one executable roadmap, build dependency-safe lanes, and verify the result with independent reviewers. Do not infer invocation from…