Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/devstride/claude-plugin/create-storynpx skills add devstride/claude-plugin --skill create-storygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/devstride/claude-pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01703 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00851 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00341 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00170 |
Grade A, and why
create-story scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to create-defect — 33 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Human output. Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/build-item/references/plain-language-output.md once per top-level run; composed skills reuse it. Apply it to every message.
Create a NEW one-off Story (the one-day leaf role — this org's Story type) — an inbound request or ad-hoc piece of work that is NOT part of a sequenced /devstride:plan roadmap — file it where you want in the DevStride map, put it on a board, assign it to the current user, then deliver it end-to-end with the SAME build loop /devstride:build-item runs, exactly ONCE (no plan walk, no next-story selection, no dependency chain). Use /devstride:insert-story instead when the work belongs in an existing sequenced plan's dependency chain — that one splices + numbers + lets the loop pick it up in order; this one is a standalone create + single build.
Argument — free text describing the story, optionally prefixed/suffixed with a parent item or workstream number (e.g. I20100 add rate limiting to webhook intake, F42 ..., or just add rate limiting to webhook intake): $ARGUMENTS
IMPORTANT — the DevStride MCP targets PRODUCTION (api.devstride.com). Every create/update here is a real, user-visible change to the live workspace — there is no draft/sandbox mode.
This skill has two phases: (A) CREATE + PLACE the item interactively (steps 0–1), then (B) DELIVER it by invoking build-item in its one-off mode (step 2). Phase B is the EXACT same branch → build → review → PR → merge → completion ritual the plan loop uses — the only difference is it runs once and is not part of a sequenced plan.
0. Gather placement + assignment — ask at the OUTSET, do not guess
- First, require enough to act on. If
$ARGUMENTSis empty, or too thin to write an honest one-paragraph spec from (a bare invocation, or a vague fragment like "fix the thing"), STOP and ask the user what the work actually is — the request and the outcome they want — before creating or resolving anything. Do NOT invent a ticket or proceed on a guess.
Once you have a real description, pin these down (inbound work has no natural home in the graph, so ask — don't guess):
- Where in the map? Ask which parent item to file under — an item at any grouping level of your
org's hierarchy (this org: Module / Capability / Epic;
I#####) or a workstream/folder (F####). If$ARGUMENTSalready carries one, confirm it rather than re-asking; otherwise ask. Resolve withresolve_item/find_parent_candidates(the org's story-flavored leaf type viaget_work_type_hierarchy; this org:Story) and NEVER guess a parent — the backend rejects illegal parent/type pairings anyway. - Which board? Ask which DevStride board it should live on (a triage/kanban board, or a current cycle/sprint). List the candidates with
list_boards; resolve the chosen board's id and its default not-started lane withget_board. A one-off ticket should be VISIBLE on a board — unlike sequenced-plan items, which live on the Gantt. - Assignee = the current user by default. Resolve the caller via
whoami(identity → username) and assign the item to that user (assigneeUsername). State who that resolved to and allow the user to name a different assignee before creating. - Resolve the org's priority order (
get_workspace_context, same non-canonical-config caveat asplanstep 0) so you can set a sensiblepriorityId— default the org's normal/medium priority unless the user flags it urgent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 52 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 7e03430c4b59
create-story is a skill published in the GitHub repository devstride/claude-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,703 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to create-defect, differing in 33 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…