Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/devstride/claude-plugin/rebalancenpx skills add devstride/claude-plugin --skill rebalancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/devstride/claude-pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00054 | $0.05748 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.02874 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00575 |
Grade A, and why
rebalance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 327 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Human output. Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/build-item/references/plain-language-output.md once per top-level run; composed skills reuse it. Apply it to every message.
Re-slice a live DevStride plan's NOT-STARTED leaves to a new delivery profile in place. Never touch shipped or in-flight work; carry every existing spec into its successor; delete nothing.
The profile itself — what grain and specDepth mean for each of prototype / standard /
enterprise, the resolution order, and the root marker this skill rewrites — is defined ONCE, in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/plan/references/delivery-profiles.md. Read that file first and
apply it by citation; this skill never restates its table.
Arguments — a grouping item to re-slice (a whole plan root, or a single release unit — this org's
Epic — to scope the re-slice to that unit; e.g. I20100) and the target profile as a bare word
anywhere in the arguments (prototype, standard or enterprise — the contract's argument form),
optionally with --dry-run; this skill REQUIRES both, so missing either → ask, never guess:
$ARGUMENTS
IMPORTANT — the DevStride MCP targets PRODUCTION (api.devstride.com). Every create_item,
add_relationship, bulk_update_items, update_item and archive_item call this skill makes is a
real, immediate, user-visible change to the live plan — there is no draft/sandbox mode. Nothing is
written before the explicit sign-off in step 2, and a dry run writes nothing at all.
IMPORTANT — this is a Gantt-grooming skill: it changes DevStride data only, never the repo. Building
the re-sliced stories is /devstride:build-item's job, afterwards.
IMPORTANT — the same Workflow-drafting split plan enforces applies here. Interactive judgment —
which leaves merge, where a coarse leaf splits, every "does this grouping still deliver a vertical
slice?" call, and the sign-off — happens in the main conversation. A Workflow is used only for
bulk drafting of successor specs once the shape is agreed, one agent per release unit, and its
agents DRAFT ONLY: they never call an MCP write tool. Workflow output is a proposal to review, not a
commit.
0. Safety gates — all of them, before a single read is trusted
- Parse
$ARGUMENTS. Resolve the item number withget_item(view:"full"). It must be a grouping item (a container level — this org: Module/Capability/Epic), never a leaf; a leaf argument → stop and ask for its release unit or plan root. The target profile is the bare wordprototype,standardorenterprisewherever it appears in the arguments (the contract's resolution-order item 1); no such word, or any other word in its place → ask. If either is missing, ask — a wrong root re-slices somebody else's plan, and a guessed profile is the wrong grain applied at production speed. Note--dry-runif present. - Resolve this org's work-type roles at runtime with
get_work_type_hierarchy(andget_workspace_contextfor lanes and priorities): which types are executable leaves, which level is the release unit (the level/devstride:build-itembranches and releases at), and which are plain containers above it. Bind every role word in this file to what the call returns — never assume "Story"/"Epic" spelling or hierarchy depth. When the release-unit level is ambiguous from structure alone, use the consuming repo's.claude/ds-config.jsonhierarchyRoles.releaseUnitas the tie-breaker if the repo is known, otherwise ask. Say "grouping item" or the org's real type name in anything user-facing — never "container". - Refuse to run while a build loop is active on this plan — two writers on one plan is the
collision. Two checks, either a hard stop: an In Progress leaf under the root with a
live branch (
get_item_branches, orgit ls-remote --heads origin "*/I<number>-*"when the repo is known); or the handoff project memory naming this root (or an ancestor/descendant) as mid-iteration. Report what tripped and stop — never wait it out, never move an In Progress item to clear the gate. An In Progress leaf with NO branch is not an active loop but stays untouchable (step 1). - Confirm the organization-wide dependency auto-scheduler is OFF — apply the canonical Enable
Link Mode rule in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/rationalize-gantt/references/auto-scheduler-off.md: its READ-ONLY check now (get_organization_metadata, have the user disable the setting if on, never change it automatically) andstaticModeomitted from every write this skill makes. Its probe-date verification is a WRITE (update_itemon a live item and a restore), so it does not run here: it runs at the top of step 3, after sign-off, and never on a dry run. Step 3 rewrites edges and step 3f rewrites dates; with propagation on, the backend would overwrite both behind you. - Re-run the loop check immediately before step 3 writes anything — the proposal in step 2 can take a while, and a loop started during it is exactly the collision the gate exists to prevent.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 327 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 42dc390918ab
rebalance is a skill published in the GitHub repository devstride/claude-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 5,748 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…