Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dixus/claudeframework/commitnpx skills add dixus/claudeframework --skill commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dixus/claudeframeworkWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01194 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00597 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00239 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create one or more commits from the current working tree changes.
$ARGUMENTS is optional. Pass --all to skip the diff analysis and commit everything as a single commit.
Steps
- Run
git statusto see staged and unstaged changes - Run
git diff HEAD(staged + unstaged) to understand the full scope of changes - Analyse the diff for distinct logical concerns — ask: would a reviewer understand this as one coherent change, or are there multiple independent things happening?
If multiple distinct concerns are detected (and --all was not passed):
- List the concerns found (e.g. "engine logic change", "new test file", "updated README")
- Propose a split: one atomic commit per concern
- For each proposed commit: describe what it covers and suggest the message
- Ask the user to confirm the split or adjust it
- After confirmation, guide through staging and committing each group in sequence
If a single concern (or --all was passed):
- Proceed to the next step
-
Read project commit conventions: Check if
.claude/rules/branch-management.mdexists. If it does, read it to understand project-specific branch naming and commit message conventions. Then:- Run
git branch --show-currentto get the current branch name - Attempt to parse the branch name according to the documented convention to extract a ticket/issue identifier (e.g. regex
^(\d+)\.(Bug|Improvement|Feature)\.([^.]+)\.(.+)$extracts ticket ID from segment 1) - If the full pattern does not match, try a fallback pattern
^(\d+)\.(.+)$to extract at least the ticket number - If a ticket ID is found, note it for use in the commit message (step 8)
- If no ticket ID can be parsed and the project rules require one, ask the user for the ticket ID before proceeding
- If no
branch-management.mdexists, skip this step
- Run
-
Backlog check: if the commit message references a task/PRD identifier (e.g.
PRD-17,TASK-5), search for a backlog or tracker file in.claude/input/that contains that identifier as a heading. If found and the heading does not already have a ✅ marker, add ✅ to the heading and include the file in the commit. Skip this step if no backlog file exists. -
Run pre-commit checks in this order — read the commands from CLAUDE.md (skip any not listed): a. Typecheck (e.g.
tsc --noEmit) b. Lint (e.g.npm run lint)- Do NOT run tests or build here — those are for
/4_test, not commit gates - If a check fails: report the failure and ask the user whether to fix it first or proceed anyway
- Do NOT run tests or build here — those are for
-
Stage the appropriate files:
- If specific files were agreed for this commit, stage only those:
git add <files> - If committing everything:
git add -A
- If specific files were agreed for this commit, stage only those:
-
Compose the commit message using conventional commit format:
<emoji> <type>(<scope>): <short description>- Keep the first line under 72 characters
- Present tense, imperative mood ("add feature" not "added feature")
<scope>is optional — use the primary directory or module affected (e.g.scoring,ui,store)
Type → emoji mapping:
Type Emoji Use when feat✨ New feature or capability fix🐛 Bug fix docs📝 Documentation only refactor♻️ Code restructured, no behaviour change test✅ Tests added or updated chore🔧 Build, config, tooling, dependencies perf⚡️ Performance improvement style🎨 Formatting, whitespace, no logic change ci🚀 CI/CD pipeline changes revert⏪️ Reverts a previous commit Project-specific ticket suffix: If a ticket ID was extracted in step 4, append
#<ticketId>to the end of the commit message. Ensure the#is NOT at the start of the message (git treats leading#as a comment). The final format becomes:<emoji> <type>(<scope>): <short description> #<ticketId>Example:
✨ feat(ui): add loading spinner to search results #1234
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 100 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 545cedce66c9
commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository dixus/claudeframework (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,194 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…