subagent-driven-development

A development workflow that assigns each implementation task to a fresh helper agent, reviews the result, and performs a final review of the whole branch. A branch is a separate line of changes in version control.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when you already have a complete plan with independent tasks and want each task implemented and checked separately in the current session.
Why use it?
It keeps each task focused and adds review checkpoints, reducing the chance that an unnoticed mistake survives across the entire implementation.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/drizzy07x/skillquiver/subagent-driven-development
Any agent
npx skills add Drizzy07x/Skillquiver --skill subagent-driven-development
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Drizzy07x/Skillquiver

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,593 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00044 $0.01593
Opus 5 $0.00022 $0.00796
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00319
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00159

Measured yesterday against content hash ec9fccf0b8a1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

subagent-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md · 130 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Subagent-Driven Development

Execute a plan with one fresh implementer per task, a task-scoped review after each implementation, and one whole-branch review at the end.

This workflow requires isolated worker dispatch. If the host cannot dispatch subagents, use executing-plans instead.

Core principle: Fresh implementer + spec and quality review + scoped fixes + final review.

Narration: Between tool calls, use at most one short line. The ledger and tool results carry the durable record.

Continuous execution: Run every task without asking whether to continue. Stop only for an unresolved blocker, ambiguity that prevents safe progress, or completed work.

When to Use

Use this workflow when all are true:

  • A decision-complete implementation plan exists.
  • Tasks are independent enough for one implementer at a time.
  • Work stays in the current session.
  • The host supports isolated workers.

Use executing-plans for a parallel session. Return to planning when tasks are tightly coupled or the plan is incomplete.

Setup

  1. Verify an isolated workspace with using-git-worktrees. Work on main or master only with explicit user consent.

  2. Invoke this skill's scripts through Bash on every platform because packaging may not preserve executable bits. On Windows, use Git Bash.

  3. Resolve the plan workspace:

    bash <skill-dir>/scripts/sdd-workspace PLAN_FILE
    

    The command prints <repo-root>/.skillquiver/sdd/<plan-basename>-<path-hash>/. This git-ignored directory owns every artifact for this plan: ledger, briefs, reports, and review packages. Never reuse another plan's directory.

  4. Inspect <workspace>/progress.md:

    • If its first line names this plan, treat every Task <N>: complete line as authoritative and resume at the first incomplete task.
    • If a task ends with a fix-round entry, resume at the next round.
    • If the ledger names another plan, or exists at the obsolete .superpowers/sdd/progress.md, leave it intact and create this plan's ledger.
  5. Create a missing ledger with # SDD ledger — plan: <plan file path> as its first line.

  6. Read the plan once, record its context and Global Constraints, and create one todo per task.

  7. Before Task 1, scan the complete plan for contradictions between tasks, Global Constraints, and the review rubric. Present all conflicts in one batched question beside the binding plan text. Proceed immediately when the scan is clean.

Read the full file on GitHub · 130 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 130 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A ec9fccf0b8a1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

subagent-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository Drizzy07x/Skillquiver (2 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,593 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

agent-host-chat-contributions

Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.

microsoft/vscode · 56 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens