qa-execution-runner

A runbook for executing automated and visual QA test cases against a deployed build.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when validating a task in a deployed environment, especially web interfaces and API-connected flows.
Why use it?
It checks that the expected tests, specifications, UI test markers, visual references, and deployment details exist before running tests and routing failures.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/evolplus/talos/qa-execution-runner
Any agent
npx skills add evolplus/talos --skill qa-execution-runner
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/evolplus/talos

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 80 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,951 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00080 $0.01951
Opus 5 $0.00040 $0.00975
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00390
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00195

Measured 2d ago against content hash 45b45c01d221, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

qa-execution-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/qa-execution-runner/SKILL.md · 143 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

QA Execution Runner

Use

Use this skill for every QA-Exec dispatch.

Inputs

  • Target task file and linked US/FRs
  • docs/test-cases/by-us/<US-ID>/ and docs/test-cases/by-task/<task-id>/
  • Executable specs named by each TC
  • docs/deploy-reports/<task-id>.md
  • SRS §3.4.6 Environment Configuration when the project has FE/BE runtime scope
  • UI artifacts: design refs, visual specs, instrumentation contract, UI refs

Procedure

  1. Gather test cases:
    • read linked US IDs and FR IDs from the task;
    • load every linked by-us functional TC;
    • load task-scoped structural/api/e2e/functional TCs;
    • halt on missing expected coverage.
  2. For UI tasks, enforce strict artifact presence:
    • by-task TC directory with at least one TC;
    • docs/uiux/visual-specs/<task-id>.md;
    • instrumentation contract when UI selectors/testIDs are expected.
  3. Run bidirectional instrumentation coverage for UI tasks:
    • every contract-declared testID appears in at least one spec;
    • when bundle is reachable, every contract-declared testID ships in the bundle.
    • Route spec gaps to QA-Author and bundle gaps to FE Dev.
  4. Pre-run checks:
    • parse deploy report ## Test Environment;
    • verify base URLs, fixtures, env vars, build/commit/instrumentation identity;
    • verify env_files, env_templates, and env_validation are present; compose_config_quiet is pass; missing_required_env is none; srs_environment_contract is pass; declared_config_keys_status is all documented; and secret_values_redacted is true;
    • when SRS §3.4.6 declares runtime keys, verify the deploy report lists each declared key name with a non-secret status summary only; missing declared keys are a blocked environment state routed back to DevOps;
    • verify every Executable: file exists;
    • grep executable specs for TODO: instrumentation-contract; any hit is blocked.
    • inspect fixture reset behavior: direct DB INSERT/TRUNCATE must be followed by a synchronous reset/flush of affected caches and process-global runtime state before the SUT is read; missing capability is blocked: test-harness-state-reset routed to BE Dev.
    • for direct-DB fixtures, require deploy-report test_endpoints_enabled: true and runtime_state_reset.synchronous_probe: pass plus runtime_state_reset.behavioral_fresh_read_probe: pass; missing or failed evidence routes to DevOps/BE Dev and blocks the runner.
    • inspect runner concurrency: any global DB reset, global cache flush, or process-global reset requires per-worker isolation or a dedicated one-worker project; otherwise mark blocked: shared-test-state.
    • compare navigation assertions with the signed-off URL/canonicalization contract. A path-only $ assertion that rejects required query parameters is blocked: test-spec-contract-drift, routed to QA-Author.
    • if any pre-run check is blocked, halt before invoking the runner. Record the blocked reason and owning role; do not continue to Step 7 with a known-invalid harness/spec.
  5. Skip deprecated US test cases with reason deprecated-us; report the skip.
  6. Select runner from solution-defaults, project ADRs, and SRS UI Introspection Profile. Load ui-test-execution and any relevant runner reference.
  7. Invoke the runner against the deployed environment, never against production data.
  8. For UI tasks:
    • Tier 1 functional always;
    • Tier 2 structural/token always where introspection allows;
    • Tier 3 visual diff only when SRS marks Visual-Critical.
  9. Validate visual spec before UI execution:
    • Status: Generated;
    • Figma version matches confirmed task version;
    • handoff hash matches current handoff.
    • reference-render Node IDs, Figma version, dimensions, and checksums are present;
    • Visual Composition Assertions and Asset Assertions are non-empty and cover every handoff composition/AST row.
  10. Report each TC as pass, fail, blocked, or skipped.
  11. For failures, attach actual vs expected, logs/screenshots/traces/diffs, and suspected track.
  12. Write docs/qa-reports/<task-id>.md and artifacts under docs/qa-reports/<task-id>/.
  13. Emit plan-update.json: in-test -> done only when no fail/blocked cases remain; otherwise in-test -> failed.

Read the full file on GitHub · 143 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 143 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 45b45c01d221

Subscribe to this mod's changes

qa-execution-runner is a skill published in the GitHub repository evolplus/talos (8 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 1,951 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

agent-host-chat-contributions

Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.

microsoft/vscode · 56 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens