Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to floor/vlist. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/floor/vlist/main/.claude/skills/api-surface/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/floor/vlistWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/floor/vlist/api-surface)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/floor/vlist/api-surface"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/floor/vlist/api-surface/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/floor/vlist/api-surface"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/floor/vlist/api-surface.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00319 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00128 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
api-surface scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
API Surface Check
List all public exports from the vlist package.
Context
- Main entry: !
cat src/index.ts - Internals entry: !
cat src/internals.ts 2>/dev/null || echo "no internals.ts"
Instructions
-
Parse
src/index.tsandsrc/internals.tsto list every public export. -
Categorize exports:
- Functions — factory functions like
vlist,withGrid, etc. - Types — TypeScript type/interface exports
- Constants — exported constant values
- Classes — any exported classes
- Functions — factory functions like
-
Output format:
## Public API (src/index.ts) ### Functions - `vlist(config)` — Builder factory - `withGrid(config)` — Grid layout feature ... ### Types - `VList<T>` — Main instance interface - `BuilderConfig` — Configuration options ... ### Constants - `OVERSCAN` — Default overscan count (3) ... ## Internals (src/internals.ts) ... -
For each feature factory function (
with*), note its config type if one exists. -
Flag anything that looks like it might be accidentally exported (internal helpers, underscore-prefixed, etc.).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 434f2165dc4f
api-surface is a skill published in the GitHub repository floor/vlist (18 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 319 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
no-bare-casts
Writing as in TypeScript or TSX production code, modifying a file that contains a bare as cast, silencing a type error with a cast, encountering as unknown as, or reviewing a cast site.
update-pr
Update the pull request for the current session. Use when the user wants to push new changes to an existing PR.
code-review
Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues.
performance-lint-rules
Performance review guidance for Oxc linter rule implementations. Use only when reviewing Rust rule code under crates/oxclinter/src/rules/ or when explicitly auditing those rules for performance improvements.
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…