team-workflow-identify

A project-checking guide that finds the issue tracker, team details, ticket rules, and workflow status names before changing a ticket.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when checking which tracker or status to use, moving a ticket, or marking work ready for review.
Why use it?
It prevents the agent from using outdated team or status names and helps it follow the repository’s own conventions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/team-workflow-identify
Any agent
npx skills add fprochazka/claude-code-plugins --skill team-workflow-identify
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 92 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,412 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00092 $0.01412
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.00706
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00282
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00141

Measured 2d ago against content hash 3b12a61eba87, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

team-workflow-identify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/sdlc/skills/team-workflow-identify/SKILL.md · 86 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

team-workflow-identify

Ground the agent in the project's issue tracker, team and workflow states before any command reads or moves a ticket. Every value is discovered at run time. This skill hardcodes no team name, no team id and no status name — a skill that carries them turns stale the day someone renames a state.

The output is the block in "Output contract" below. Print it, and the calling command carries it for the rest of the run.

Source order

The order is fixed. Do not skip ahead.

  1. Context already loaded. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, everything they pull in through @ includes, and any memory already in context. These are free to read and they are the place a team writes its own conventions down. Search the context you already hold first — a CLAUDE.md that is a single @README.md line answers nothing on disk while its included content sits in your context. Grep the files on disk as a supplement, and follow every @ include you find:

    grep -rniE 'linear|jira|gitlab issue|github issue|team (key|id)|status|workflow|ticket|branch nam|^@' CLAUDE.md AGENTS.md 2>/dev/null | head -30
    
  2. The repo README.md. Many repos repeat the tracker facts there.

  3. The tracker API — last resort, and never silent. See "Stop before the API".

Stop before the API

If sources 1 and 2 do not answer, stop and tell the user what is missing. Do not go fishing through the API on your own. An API answer that lands nowhere is discovered again on every future run.

Offer two ways to persist the answer, and name the concrete file for each:

  • An edit to one of the loaded convention files — say which one, for example ./AGENTS.md or ./CLAUDE.md.
  • A Claude memory.

The user picks. Then query the tracker API, write the result into the chosen place, and continue. The next run reads it from source 1.

What to extract

  • Tracker — Linear, Jira, GitLab issues, GitHub issues, or none.
  • Team — display name, key, and id where the tracker has one. These are three different strings for one team. Never derive one from another.
  • Ticket ID patternTEAM-123, #123, or a tracker URL. The commands parse branch names and MR titles with it.
  • Branch convention — the documented pattern if there is one, for example <initials>/<TICKET>-<slug>. Report none when nothing documents it, and do not invent one from the branches that happen to exist.
  • Workflow states — see below.

Read the full file on GitHub · 86 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 86 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 3b12a61eba87

Subscribe to this mod's changes

team-workflow-identify is a skill published in the GitHub repository fprochazka/claude-code-plugins (11 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 1,412 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.