Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ghabix/spinecodex/remote-testsnpx skills add GhabiX/SpineCodex --skill remote-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GhabiX/SpineCodexWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00786 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00393 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
remote-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to remote-tests — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Remote executor tests exercise the app-server/exec-server split to ensure that agent features work in both local and remote execution environments.
Remote executor tests currently require an x86_64 Linux host machine. There are two flavors:
- Docker (Linux exec-server)
- Wine (Windows exec-server)
Test Fixtures
Individual test cases must opt-in to being run against a remote executor.
codex_core
Use TestCodexBuilder::build_with_auto_env() to opt-in to remote execution in core integration
tests unless the test needs more precise control over its executor.
app-server
Start the server with TestAppServer::new_with_auto_env() unless the test defines its own
$CODEX_HOME/environments.toml or will define custom environments at runtime.
Start threads with TestAppServer::send_thread_start_request_with_auto_env() if you've created the
server with the auto_env approach. Omit ThreadStartParams.environments (leave it as None) when
doing so.
Test Skips
If a test doesn't pass in a particular remote executor configuration you can skip it in just that configuration. Include a string reason for future readers when the selected skip macro supports one.
Choose the skip macro by what causes the test to fail:
skip_if_target_windows!: Windows target behavior.skip_if_wine_exec!: Wine-exec runner constraints.skip_if_host_windows!: Windows host constraints.skip_if_remote!: Local-only test behavior.skip_if_no_remote_env!: Remote-only test behavior.
Prefer defining tests that run in all host/target configurations by default. See the $path-types
skill for the most common changes required to make tests compatible.
Docker
Docker container is built and initialized via ./scripts/test-remote-env.sh. Sourcing this script
in bash also provides the codex_remote_env_cleanup function to use after testing.
To run core integration tests against a Docker remote executor:
bash -c '
set -euo pipefail
unset CODEX_TEST_REMOTE_EXEC_SERVER_URL
source scripts/test-remote-env.sh
trap codex_remote_env_cleanup EXIT
cd codex-rs
just test -p codex-core --test all
'
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 107 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 5029f27ab93f
remote-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository GhabiX/SpineCodex (126 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 786 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to remote-tests, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
codex-autoresearch
Run autonomous, measurable experiments in a Git repository: change one hypothesis, verify a numeric metric, keep improvements, and revert failures. Use when the user wants Codex to keep iterating toward a numeric target in the foreground or as a detached background run. Do not use for ordinary one-shot coding…
map-wayfind
Decision-frontier wayfinding: build and work a durable map of open design decisions BEFORE planning, for large or foggy efforts where /map-plan would force premature decomposition. Use when a task is too big or too vague to decompose — many unknowns, tangled decisions, or "I'm not even sure what to build yet" — and…
clipboard
Copy text to clipboard with optional rich formatting. Triggers on "copy to clipboard", "copy that", "pbcopy", "copy formatted", "copy rich text".
neo4j-modeling-skill
Design, review, and refactor Neo4j graph data models. Use when choosing node labels vs relationship types vs properties, migrating relational/document schemas to graph, detecting anti-patterns (generic labels, supernodes, missing constraints), designing intermediate nodes for n-ary relationships, enforcing schema with…
alphafold-database
Access AlphaFold 200M+ AI-predicted protein structures. Retrieve structures by UniProt ID, download PDB/mmCIF files, analyze confidence metrics (pLDDT, PAE), for drug discovery and structural biology.
auto-test-project
当用户明确要求"测试项目"、"运行 auto-test-project"或"进行项目级测试"时使用。对完整项目进行多轮 A 轮批判性测试 + B 轮质量检查，系统化发现、记录、修复问题。⚠️ 不适用：用户只是想优化功能（应直接修改）、只是询问项目问题（应直接回答）、没有明确"测试"意图。.