Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/google/adk-java/a-bnpx skills add google/adk-java --skill a-bgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/google/adk-javaWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00016 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00008 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00003 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00002 |
Grade A, and why
a-b scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- a_b — 100% identical, 4 lines differ
What it actually says
body
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 6 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 528081463746
a-b is a skill published in the GitHub repository google/adk-java (1,708 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 16 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
bigquery-graph
Skill for Graph Query Language (GQL) or SQL/PGQ queries against a property graph. Includes path finding, multi-hop traversal, topological connection, shortest path, node reachability, edge connectivity, and semantic graph queries.
adk-git
Writes commit messages and pull request descriptions for the adk-python repository: Conventional Commits types and scopes, subject lines that say why a change was made, and the linked-issue and testing-plan sections the PR template requires. Use when writing or rewording a commit message, squashing commits before a…
adk-sample-creator
Creates a new sample agent in the ADK Python repository — the sample directory, its agent.py, and its README.md — following the conventions the existing samples already use. Use when the user wants to add a sample or example demonstrating a feature or agent pattern (dynamic nodes, fan-out/fan-in, a standalone…
adk-unit-guide
Writes a hands-on developer guide for one ADK code unit — a minimal runnable example, how it works, a configuration-option table, advanced uses, limitations, and links to related samples — to docs/guides/{topic}/{unit}/index.md, then lists it in the index at docs/guides/README.md. Its reader is a developer calling the…
adk-architecture
Explains how the ADK runtime fits together: the node and graph execution model, Context and Event flow, checkpoint and resume, tracing, and the rules governing the public API surface. Use when answering "how does X work" about ADK internals, tracing where an event or a piece of state comes from, deciding where a new…
adk-review
Reviews the uncommitted changes in an adk-python working tree and reports correctness, design, public-API stability, test, sample and documentation gaps as a prioritized findings report, fixing them only when asked. Use when the user asks to review local changes, wants a self-review before opening a pull request, asks…