Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/harshanandak/forge/validatenpx skills add harshanandak/forge --skill validategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/harshanandak/forgeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00229 | $0.02799 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00114 | $0.01399 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00560 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00280 |
Grade A, and why
validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Note: Three things share the "validate" name in Forge:
/validate(this command): default-template validation command — rebases onto the base branch, then runs type/lint/test/security checksforge-preflight(formerly forge-validate): CLI tool — checks prerequisites before a stagebun run check(scripts/validate.js): Local quality gate — runs type/lint/test/security checks only (does NOT rebase; assumes branch is already current with the base branch)
Run comprehensive validation including type checking, linting, code review, security review, and tests.
Validate
Chain (HARD-GATE): the ONLY skill you invoke after
validateisship. Do not open the PR until validation shows fresh passing output in THIS session.
This skill validates all code before creating a pull request.
Usage
/validate
Or use the validation script (checks only — no rebase):
bun run check # Runs lint/test/security checks only. Does NOT rebase onto the base branch.
# Use /validate for the full workflow (rebase + checks).
<HARD-GATE: /validate entry — rebase onto latest base branch>
Before running ANY validation checks:
0. Resolve the base branch dynamically (do NOT hardcode master or main):
BASE=$(git remote show origin 2>/dev/null | grep 'HEAD branch' | awk '{print $NF}')
if [ -z "$BASE" ] || [ "$BASE" = "(unknown)" ]; then BASE="master"; fi
This handles repos using main, master, or any other default branch.
Falls back to "master" when HEAD is unresolved (detached remote, empty repo).
1. Fetch latest base branch:
git fetch origin "$BASE" || { echo "✗ Fetch failed — cannot verify branch freshness"; exit 1; }
The `|| { ...; exit 1; }` guard ensures fetch failures are never silently skipped.
2. Check if branch is behind:
BEHIND=$(git rev-list --count HEAD..origin/"$BASE")
3. If BEHIND > 0:
a. Run: git rebase origin/"$BASE" || REBASE_FAILED=1
b. If rebase succeeds (REBASE_FAILED unset): print "✓ Rebased onto latest $BASE ($BEHIND commits integrated)"
c. If rebase fails (REBASE_FAILED=1 — conflicts or any other error):
- Capture conflicting files BEFORE aborting: git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U
- Run: git rebase --abort
- Print the captured conflicting file list
- Print: "✗ Rebase conflict — resolve manually, then re-run /validate"
- STOP. Do NOT proceed to any validation checks.
4. If BEHIND = 0:
Print "✓ Branch is up-to-date with $BASE" and continue.
Rationale: Without this step, validation checks run against stale code that doesn't
include recent base branch changes. Integration issues are only caught after the PR is
created, wasting CI cycles and review time. Rebasing here ensures /validate results
reflect the true state of what will be merged.
</HARD-GATE>
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 321 lines · 229 tokens per session scan A da45a87b77f3
validate is a skill published in the GitHub repository harshanandak/forge (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 229 tokens to every session and 2,799 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.