Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guide/elixir-essentialsnpx skills add j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guide --skill elixir-essentialsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guideWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.02438 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01219 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00488 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00244 |
Grade A, and why
elixir-essentials scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 426 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Elixir Essentials
RULES — Follow these with no exceptions
- Use pattern matching over if/else for control flow and data extraction
- Add @impl true before every callback function (mount, handle_event, handle_info, etc.)
- Return {:ok, result} | {:error, reason} tuples for fallible operations
- Use
withfor 2+ sequential fallible operations instead of nested case - Use the pipe operator for 2+ chained transformations
- Never nest if/else statements — use case, cond, or multi-clause functions
- Predicate functions end with
?, dangerous functions end with! - Let it crash — don't write defensive code for impossible states
Pattern Matching
Pattern matching is the primary control flow mechanism in Elixir. Prefer it over conditional statements.
Prefer Pattern Matching Over if/else
Bad:
def process(result) do
if result.status == :ok do
result.data
else
nil
end
end
Good:
def process(%{status: :ok, data: data}), do: data
def process(_), do: nil
Use Case for Multiple Patterns
Bad:
# Nested if inside else — hard to read and not how Elixir expresses multi-way branching
def handle_response(response) do
if response.status == 200 do
{:ok, response.body}
else
if response.status == 404 do
{:error, :not_found}
else
{:error, :unknown}
end
end
end
Good:
def handle_response(%{status: 200, body: body}), do: {:ok, body}
def handle_response(%{status: 404}), do: {:error, :not_found}
def handle_response(_), do: {:error, :unknown}
Pipe Operator
Use the pipe operator |> to chain function calls for improved readability.
Basic Piping
Bad:
String.upcase(String.trim(user_input))
Good:
user_input
|> String.trim()
|> String.upcase()
Pipe into Function Heads
Bad:
def process_user(user) do
validated = validate_user(user)
transformed = transform_user(validated)
save_user(transformed)
end
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 426 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 2ed1cd79fec2
elixir-essentials is a skill published in the GitHub repository j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guide (156 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 2,438 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.