Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jepegit/issue-flow/iflow-fixnpx skills add jepegit/issue-flow --skill iflow-fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jepegit/issue-flowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01686 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00843 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00337 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
iflow-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
issue-flow — interactive iterative-fix session (/iflow-fix)
Follow this skill for an ongoing working session of many small fixes (small bugs, typos, chores, polish) on one branch, landed via one PR — rather than a single well-defined deliverable.
Do not use this skill from /iflow, /iflow-build, or /iflow-close. /iflow-fix is explicit-only because it creates GitHub issues and branches and drives an open-ended loop. While a session is active, drive it with /iflow-fix + /iflow-close, not /iflow.
It coexists with /iflow-pick fix (one-shot general-fixes setup into /iflow-plan → /iflow-build) and /iflow-issue (one well-specified normal issue). /iflow-fix stays and runs the loop until close.
Input
- a name (e.g.
polish-cli-output) — used for the issue title and branch slug. - (nothing) — default the slug to
iterative-small-fixes(made unique via the new issue number). - a description during an active session — run the next fix in the loop.
Invoke: type iflow fix in chat, or /iflow-fix from the slash menu (iflow-fix also works).
MODEL & EXECUTION DIRECTIVE
Profile: reasoning — Prioritize deep thinking and careful trade-offs over speed or token economy.
In Cursor: switch to a thinking-capable model before invoking this step (not Auto-only).
Keep scope tight to what this step requires.
Resolve project root (multi-root workspaces)
Before any git, gh, or .issueflows/ path operation in this workflow:
Resolution order (stop when unambiguous):
- Explicit hints in slash input —
root:<path>,repo:<folder-basename>(directory name, e.g.cellpy-core), orrepo:owner/name. - CLI fast path —
issue-flow agent resolve [-C <start>] [--from-file <active-file>] [--json]. Use the returnedproject_rootandrepo; pass-C <project_root>to otherissue-flow agent …subcommands. When the answer came from the workspace registry, the payload setsresolved_via_workspace_default: true. - Branch context — exactly one workspace repo whose branch matches
^\d+-→ that root. - Single scaffold — exactly one
.issueflows/tree visible in the workspace → that root. - Workspace default — an
issueflow-workspace.tomlat the workspace root (created withissue-flow workspace init) may name adefaultmember repo; use it when no scaffold matched above. Tell the user the default was used. - Ambiguous → stop and ask; never guess between sibling repos.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 99 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 82a39ee2c2c5
iflow-fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository jepegit/issue-flow (4 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,686 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.