iflow-graphify

A workflow step that rebuilds Graphify’s project knowledge graph, which maps code structure and relationships.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to update the graph, extract richer relationships, watch for changes, or create clusters.
Why use it?
It refreshes the graph after major code changes or when creating it for the first time.

Skill for Claude CodeCodexCursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jepegit/issue-flow/iflow-graphify
Any agent
npx skills add jepegit/issue-flow --skill iflow-graphify
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jepegit/issue-flow

Made for: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor.

Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 989 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00036 $0.00989
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00495
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00198
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00099

Measured 2d ago against content hash 71e446e9a789, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

iflow-graphify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/skills/iflow-graphify/SKILL.md · 80 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

issue-flow — graph rebuild (/iflow-graphify)

Follow this skill to refresh the project's graphify knowledge graph — a stale graphify-out/ after a large refactor, or the initial graph after installing graphifyy.

Do not use this skill from /iflow-build, /iflow-close, or /iflow. /iflow-graphify is opt-in only.

Invoke: type iflow graphify in chat, or /iflow-graphify from the slash menu (iflow-graphify also works).

MODEL & EXECUTION DIRECTIVE

Profile: economy — Prioritize speed and token economy over deep reasoning.

In Cursor: use Auto or a fast model before invoking this step.

Keep scope tight to what this step requires.

Instructions

  1. Prefer issue-flow graphify from the project root:

    issue-flow graphify
    

    With no extra args this runs graphify update <project> — AST-only, no LLM API key required, produces the full graphify-out/. To pick a different graphify subcommand, pass it as the first arg: issue-flow graphify extract (adds the slower semantic LLM pass for richer relationships — needs an API key), issue-flow graphify watch (live), issue-flow graphify cluster-only --no-viz, etc. Use -C <dir> to scan a project other than the current directory. Trailing flags pass through verbatim. Do not invent new wrapper flags.

  2. Fallback to graphify directly when issue-flow is unavailable:

    graphify update .
    

    graphify is subcommand-based — graphify . on its own is not valid (graphify reports unknown command '.'). Always pick a subcommand: update for the no-LLM AST build, extract for the full semantic pass, watch for a long-running watcher, etc.

  3. If graphify exits with "no LLM API key found", the user picked extract (or another semantic subcommand) without configuring a backend. Cursor's own LLM is not available to subprocesses, so graphify cannot reuse it. Suggest one of:

    • Set an API key for GEMINI_API_KEY / GOOGLE_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_KEY, or MOONSHOT_API_KEY.
    • Run issue-flow graphify extract --backend ollama to use a local LLM via Ollama (requires Ollama installed with a model pulled).
    • Drop the extract arg and use the default issue-flow graphify (AST-only, no LLM).

Read the full file on GitHub · 80 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 80 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 71e446e9a789

Subscribe to this mod's changes

iflow-graphify is a skill published in the GitHub repository jepegit/issue-flow (4 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 989 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens