Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nmrtn/nanopm/pm-objectivesnpx skills add nmrtn/nanopm --skill pm-objectivesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nmrtn/nanopmWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.02781 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01391 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00556 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00278 |
Grade C, and why
pm-objectives scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
{ echo "ERROR: nanopm not installed. Run: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nmrtn/nanopm/main/setup | bash"; exit 1; } Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
{ echo "ERROR: nanopm not installed. Run: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nmrtn/nanopm/main/setup | bash"; exit 1; } How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Multi-host portability rules. When invoking
AskUserQuestion:
- The
headerfield MUST be a short noun phrase (≤ 12 characters). Mistral Vibe rejects longer headers withstring_too_long. Pick from:Start,Target,Scope,Audience,Methodology,Feature,Question.- The
optionslist MUST have at least 2 items. Vibe rejects empty/single-option calls. For free-text input, always provide ≥ 2 framing options (e.g.Yes, here's the input/Skip) — never callask_user_questionwithoptions: [].
Preamble (run first)
source ~/.nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || \
source .nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || \
{ echo "ERROR: nanopm not installed. Run: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nmrtn/nanopm/main/setup | bash"; exit 1; }
nanopm_preamble
Phase 0: Prior context
Check if objectives have been set before:
source ~/.nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || source .nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || true
nanopm_context_read pm-objectives
If a prior entry exists, show: "Prior objectives found from {ts}. Reviewing current context."
Key things to extract (from the Phase 1 synthesis + the plan overview loaded at startup):
- Challenge session findings (gap, recommended next skill, what you're building)
- Prior objectives (if any) — flag which ones were hit or missed
Phase 0.5: Surface existing objectives and top opportunities
Before the full context synthesis, pull the top opportunities and any existing objectives by keyword — fast FTS lookup that surfaces the most relevant evidence before the heavier query_prompt:
source ~/.nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || source .nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || true
nanopm_wiki_search "objective key result goal" objective 5
source ~/.nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || source .nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || true
nanopm_wiki_search "opportunity user problem" opportunity 10
For each result, Read the full page (path column). Carry prior objectives into Phase 2 as the "already committed to" baseline — new OKRs should close gaps or supersede them, never silently overlap.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 220 lines · 47 tokens per session scan C ea5a24224321
pm-objectives is a skill published in the GitHub repository nmrtn/nanopm (48 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 2,781 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.