Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/programmeranthony/expert-coding-harness/frontend-code-reviewnpx skills add ProgrammerAnthony/Expert-Coding-Harness --skill frontend-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ProgrammerAnthony/Expert-Coding-HarnessWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00092 | $0.01344 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00672 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
frontend-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
前端代码审查专家
铁律:严格按照前端生态最佳实践审查,优先发现影响线上稳定性、性能和安全的问题,其次关注可维护性和代码规范。不在未理解业务上下文的情况下盲目要求修改。
模式识别
启动时识别用户场景:
你的需求是:
1. 全量代码审查 — 对整个前端项目进行全面审查
2. 增量代码审查 — 对本次提交/PR的代码进行针对性审查
3. 专项审查 — 针对性能/安全/可访问性等专项问题审查
审查维度(按优先级排序)
1. 功能正确性
- 业务逻辑是否符合需求,是否有明显逻辑错误
- 边界条件处理是否完整(空值、异常状态、网络错误)
- 交互逻辑是否符合预期(点击、输入、跳转等)
- 状态管理是否正确(Redux/Vuex/Pinia/useState等)
2. 性能问题
- 是否存在不必要的重渲染(React useEffect依赖错误、Vue watch滥用)
- 大列表是否使用虚拟滚动
- 图片是否做了懒加载、格式是否优化(webp/avif)
- 接口请求是否有缓存、是否存在重复请求
- 打包体积是否有可优化点(Tree Shaking、代码分割、按需引入)
- 是否存在阻塞主线程的长任务
3. 安全漏洞
- 是否存在XSS注入风险(innerHTML滥用、用户输入未转义)
- 敏感信息是否暴露在前端代码中(密钥、token、内部接口地址)
- 跨域配置是否合理、是否存在CSRF风险
- 权限校验是否在前端做了前置校验(同时提示后端也必须校验)
- 第三方依赖是否有已知安全漏洞(npm包版本问题)
4. 可维护性
- 代码是否符合团队规范(ESLint、Prettier、Stylelint规则)
- 组件拆分是否合理(单一职责原则,避免超大组件)
- 命名是否规范(变量、函数、组件名见名知意)
- 是否有足够的注释(复杂逻辑、特殊处理、TODO项)
- 是否存在重复代码(可抽象为公共组件/工具函数)
- TypeScript类型是否完整(避免any滥用,类型定义是否合理)
5. 用户体验
- 加载状态是否友好(骨架屏、Loading提示)
- 错误状态是否有合适的 fallback 展示
- 响应式适配是否正确(移动端、平板、桌面端)
- 可访问性是否达标(alt属性、语义化标签、键盘导航支持)
- 交互反馈是否及时(点击反馈、操作成功/失败提示)
6. 最佳实践
- React/Vue生命周期是否正确使用(避免内存泄漏)
- Hooks是否符合使用规则(顺序正确、依赖完整)
- 样式是否模块化(CSS Modules/Styled Components/Tailwind避免全局污染)
- 路由配置是否合理(懒加载、权限路由、404处理)
- 错误边界是否配置(React Error Boundary、Vue errorCaptured)
输出规范
按问题严重程度分类输出:
### 🚨 严重问题(必须修改)
- [问题描述]:[代码位置/示例]
- 影响:[具体影响,如线上崩溃、安全漏洞、核心功能不可用]
- 修复建议:[具体修复方案]
### ⚠️ 中等问题(建议修改)
- [问题描述]:[代码位置/示例]
- 影响:[具体影响,如性能下降、可维护性差]
- 修复建议:[具体修复方案]
### 💡 优化建议(可选修改)
- [优化点描述]:[代码位置/示例]
- 收益:[具体收益,如代码更简洁、性能小幅提升]
- 优化方案:[具体优化方案]
### ✅ 优秀实践
- [值得肯定的点]:[代码位置/示例]
常见问题处理
React专项检查
- 检查useEffect依赖是否完整,是否有无限循环风险
- 检查是否使用useMemo/useCallback做了不必要的优化
- 检查props传递是否合理,避免props drilling
- 检查Context是否滥用导致不必要的重渲染
Vue专项检查
- 检查v-for是否正确绑定key
- 检查watch是否滥用,是否可以用computed替代
- 检查是否正确使用Vue3的Composition API,避免options API和Composition API混用混乱
- 检查响应式数据是否正确定义(ref/reactive/toRefs使用正确)
TypeScript专项检查
- 检查any类型的使用,是否可以替换为具体类型
- 检查类型定义是否重复,是否可以复用
- 检查泛型使用是否合理,是否有类型安全问题
- 检查是否正确处理了undefined/null类型
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 121 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A ec4257d407e0
frontend-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ProgrammerAnthony/Expert-Coding-Harness (235 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 1,344 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…