run

A workflow for creating code from a GitHub issue with a signed record of what happened. The record uses a tamper-evident chain and is packaged as an .rpack provenance bundle.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps turn assigned GitHub issues into tracked code-generation work. It is for projects that need cryptographically signed evidence of the development process.
Why use it?
It provides an auditable history for AI-assisted development, including why changes were made and whether the record was altered. It also guides the user through selecting an issue and setting up the required Python interpreter.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ryanjmichie-git/forgeproof-plugin/run
Any agent
npx skills add ryanjmichie-git/forgeproof-plugin --skill run
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ryanjmichie-git/forgeproof-plugin

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 84 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,297 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00084 $0.02297
Opus 5 $0.00042 $0.01149
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.00459
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00230

Measured yesterday against content hash 3a22f0f3e025, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 5 executable files (scripts/conftest.py, scripts/fixtures/v101/src/example.py, scripts/fixtures/v110/src/example2.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/run/SKILL.md · 239 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 239 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

ForgeProof: Provenance-Tracked Code Generation

Execute a cryptographically signed development workflow. Every action is recorded in a tamper-evident Ed25519 hash chain. The output is an .rpack provenance bundle that proves what was done, why, and that nothing was altered after signing.

The provenance engine script is at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/run/scripts/forgeproof.py. Reference it as $FP in all commands below for brevity.

Interpreter setup (do this once, before anything else): determine the Python interpreter: run python3 --version; if that fails or reports that Python is not found, run python --version. Set $FP_PY to whichever succeeded and use it for every engine invocation below. The examples below use bash syntax ("$FP_PY" "$FP" <subcommand> ...); if your shell is PowerShell, adapt the invocation (& $FP_PY $FP <subcommand> ...) and any command substitutions accordingly — execute the intent, not the literal bash syntax.

Issue Selection

If $ARGUMENTS is empty (no issue number provided):

  1. Run: "$FP_PY" "$FP" issues --assignee @me
  2. Present the list to the user as a numbered list showing issue number, title, and labels
  3. Ask the user to pick one
  4. Set $ISSUE to the chosen issue number and continue

If $ARGUMENTS contains an issue number, set $ISSUE to that number and continue.

Phase 0 — Preflight

Run the dependency check:

"$FP_PY" "$FP" preflight

If any check fails, stop and tell the user exactly what is missing and how to install it. Do not proceed until all checks pass.

Then detect the project toolchain:

"$FP_PY" "$FP" detect

Parse the JSON output. Store the detected test_runner.command and linter.command for use in Phase 3. If no language is detected, ask the user to specify their test command and lint command.

Phase 1 — Parse & Plan

Fetch the issue:

gh issue view $ISSUE --json title,body,labels,assignees,comments

Read the issue body carefully. Extract structured requirements from it. Number them as REQ-1, REQ-2, etc. Each requirement should be a single, testable statement.

Read the full file on GitHub · 239 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 239 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 3a22f0f3e025

Subscribe to this mod's changes

run is a skill published in the GitHub repository ryanjmichie-git/forgeproof-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 2,297 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens