Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add telagod/code-abyss --skill architecting-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/telagod/code-abyssWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/telagod/code-abyss/architecting-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/telagod/code-abyss/architecting-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/telagod/code-abyss/architecting-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/telagod/code-abyss/architecting-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/telagod/code-abyss/architecting-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.01335 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00534 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00267 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
architecting-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
安全架构与治理
判断先于执行：决定「是否做 / 选什么 / 如何取舍」（栈、方案、架构、权衡）前，先读领域判断内核
skills/_kernel/security/SKILL.md——它管 judgment，本秘典管 execution；冲突时以内核判断为准。
架构是预防层，不是补丁。先建模再写代码，先定边界再开 API。控制必须可证据化。
路由
| 意图 | 秘典 | 核心 |
|---|---|---|
| 威胁建模 | threat-modeling | STRIDE / PASTA / LINDDUN / DFD / Attack Tree |
| 身份与零信任 | identity-and-zero-trust | IAM / SSO / MFA / Kerberos / PAM / Conditional Access |
| 合规与证据 | compliance-and-evidence | SOC2 / PCI / HIPAA / GDPR / ISO27001 / DLP / 隐私工程 |
何时使用
| 场景 | 用 | 不用 |
|---|---|---|
| 新系统设计 / 新攻击面引入 | ✅ STRIDE + DFD | — |
| 重大架构变更（鉴权、数据流、信任边界） | ✅ 重新建模 | — |
| 引入 PII / PHI / PCI 数据 | ✅ LINDDUN + 合规映射 | — |
| 上线前安全门禁 / 客户安全问卷 | ✅ 控制矩阵 + 证据 | — |
| 已有架构无变更 | ❌ | 用现有控制即可 |
| 仅 bug 修复 / 样式调整 | ❌ | 走 analyzing-security |
| 渗透实施层面 | ❌ | 用 securing-systems |
执行链
威胁建模 (STRIDE/PASTA/LINDDUN)
→ 控制设计 (preventive / detective / responsive 三层)
→ 实现 (代码、IaC、policy-as-code)
→ 验证 (渗透 / 红队 / 控制测试)
→ 证据留痕 (日志 / 审计 / 合规映射)
每环必须可回答「这控制对应哪条威胁？这威胁缓解到什么残留水平？谁验收？」
决策矩阵
| 决策点 | 选项 A | 选项 B | 判据 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 鉴权协议 | SAML 2.0 | OIDC | 企业内部 SSO → SAML；移动/SPA/API → OIDC |
| MFA 强度 | TOTP / Push | FIDO2 / WebAuthn | 高价值账号、抗钓鱼 → FIDO2 强制 |
| 特权访问 | Standing privilege | JIT + Approval | 生产/敏感 → JIT；运维便利 → Standing 必有补偿 |
| 合规起步 | SOC 2 Type I | Type II | 客户问卷应付 → I；正式审计 → II（6-12月观察期） |
| 数据脱敏 | 假名化（可逆） | 匿名化（不可逆） | 业务侧仍需关联 → 假名化 + KMS；统计/共享 → 匿名化 |
| 跨境传输 | SCC | BCR | 偶发场景 → SCC；跨国集团内部 → BCR |
与其他 skill 联动
- 威胁建模产出 → analyzing-security 把高危项纳入扫描规则
- 代码层防御 → securing-systems（pentest / code-audit / red-team）
- IaC 策略落地 → provisioning-infrastructure（OPA / Sentinel / Conftest）
- LLM/Agent 系统威胁 → building-agent-systems（Prompt Injection / 模型窃取）
- API 接口面 → designing-architectures 的
api-design.md - 审计证据自动化 → automating-devops（CI 持续合规）
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 9617a7759728
architecting-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository telagod/code-abyss (242 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 1,335 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
codexkit-legal-due-diligence
Conduct structured legal due diligence for M&A, joint ventures, or investment transactions. Cover all 9 workstreams — Corporate, Contracts, IP, Litigation, Regulatory, Employment, Tax, Environmental, and Data Privacy. Produce a risk matrix with deal-breaker flags and closing conditions. Use when evaluating a target or…
codexkit-policy-document-writer
Author structured policy documents and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) following ISO document control standards. Covers purpose, scope, roles, policy statements, procedures, compliance monitoring, and review schedules. Use when creating corporate policies, operational procedures, or governance documents.
codexkit-audit-readiness-checker
Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when…
codexkit-procurement-rfp-writer
Write structured Requests for Proposal (RFP) or Requests for Quotation (RFQ) aligned with ISO 20400 sustainable procurement principles. Cover scope, technical requirements, evaluation methodology, and commercial terms. Use when sourcing vendors, services, or equipment.
codexkit-contract-drafter
Draft commercial contracts from scratch by contract type — NDAs, service agreements, vendor contracts, employment agreements, and licensing deals. Follow a clause library approach with risk-balanced terms. Use when creating new contracts. Do not replace legal counsel sign-off on finalized agreements. For reviewing…
codexkit-compliance-gap-review
Compare policies, procedures, onboarding files, or operating evidence against a named compliance framework such as AML/KYC, privacy, internal controls, or audit readiness. Use when a team needs a gap matrix, control checklist, remediation priorities, or evidence request list. Do not use when no target framework is…