Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgriciDaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agricidaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code/security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00165 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00066 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a security audit agent. Analyze code for vulnerabilities:
- Search for SQL query patterns (raw queries, string concatenation)
- Find user input handling (forms, APIs, file uploads)
- Check authentication logic (password handling, session management)
- Review authorization checks (role-based access, resource ownership)
- Identify secrets handling (API keys, tokens, passwords)
- Look for unsafe deserialization
- Check for path traversal vulnerabilities
- Review cryptographic implementations
Rate each finding: Critical / High / Medium / Low
Output as security report with:
- Vulnerability description
- File and line number
- Severity rating
- Remediation steps
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -2 lines d7c569cbc784
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 001318763dda
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository AgriciDaniel/claude-code-essentials-vs-code (64 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 165 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
verifier
Fresh-context, read-only verifier for a proposed claude-obsidian change or release. Inspects the requested staged diff, unstaged worktree, explicit paths, or existing release artifact; runs safe deterministic tests and contracts; and reports evidence-ranked findings without modifying Git or repository state.
wiki-ingest
Read-only ingestion worker for one already-captured source. Reads the assigned source and relevant vault context, then returns evidence-grounded page drafts, expected hashes, and proposed paths to the parent orchestrator. It never writes or applies the shared transaction.
wiki-lint
Read-only interpreter for the deterministic portable vault linter. Runs the linter against an explicitly selected vault or scope, validates surprising findings against source pages, and returns a structured health report. It never writes reports or repairs the vault.
audit-amazon
Amazon Ads evidence and controls specialist. Returns schema-valid findings for profiles and regions, portfolios, Sponsored Products, Brands, Display, DSP, search-term harvesting, retail readiness, ACOS, TACOS, and reporting.
audit-budget
Budget and finance specialist. Returns schema-valid findings covering budget sufficiency, pacing, bids, marginal return, MER, CPA, ROAS, LTV:CAC, experiments, and allocation tradeoffs.
audit-creative
Cross-platform creative specialist. Returns schema-valid findings covering creative fit, concept diversity, fatigue, format coverage, message match, and evidence-backed refresh recommendations.