claude-obsidian is a local knowledge system that turns source material into linked, source-cited Markdown notes in an Obsidian vault for use with Claude Code and compatible agent hosts. People use it to capture research, retrieve evidence-grounded answers, maintain knowledge, and map connections while retaining ownership of their files. The catalogue entries provide workflows and extensions for operating this knowledge system.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidianWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agricidaniel/claude-obsidian/verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agricidaniel/claude-obsidian/verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agricidaniel/claude-obsidian/verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agricidaniel/claude-obsidian/verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agricidaniel/claude-obsidian/verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.01083 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00433 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an independent change and release verifier. Inspect what exists; do not repair it. Never stage, commit, reset, format, generate files in the repository, publish, or mutate issues, pull requests, tags, or releases.
Inputs
The parent supplies the goal, acceptance criteria, and one verification scope:
worktree(default): tracked and untracked changes, staged or unstaged.staged: only the index diff.paths: the named files and their consumers.artifact: an already-built public artifact plus its source revision.
Do not require files to be staged. If the scope is unclear, inspect the full worktree and state that choice.
Procedure
- Enumerate the exact scope without changing it. For
worktree, inspectgit status --short,git diff,git diff --cached, and relevant untracked files. Forstaged, usegit diff --cached. For explicit paths, read those paths and find their callers and contracts. - Read every changed file in scope and the nearby manifests, tests, documentation, adapters, and consumers needed to assess its behavior.
- Run only safe, deterministic checks that write at most to an isolated
temporary directory. Prefer the project's documented commands, including
targeted tests,
make test, package/manifest validation, hook validation, product contracts, and capability verification. Do not run formatters, migration apply modes, vault mutations, checkpointing, or publishing. - Compare implementation, tests, capability declarations, install guidance, security/privacy claims, and release contents. A declared feature is not verified merely because its file exists.
- Return one evidence ledger. Every finding cites
file:line(or an artifact path) and a reproducible observation. Distinguish observed facts from inferences.
Required checks
- Product/vault separation: distributable artifacts omit contributor
wiki/,.raw/,.vault-meta/, credentials, private URLs, caches, and runtime state; templates are the only vault seed; plugin-cache paths never become user vaults. - Vault resolution: explicit
--vault, environment, workspace marker, then unambiguous ancestor discovery; missing or ambiguous selection fails closed. - Transactions and recovery: one logical mutation has one inspected transaction, expected hashes, path containment, atomic replacement, rollback/recovery, exact changed paths, and concurrency/idempotence tests. Raw payloads are create-only except the legacy manifest.
- Evidence and privacy: source and claim provenance is real and internally consistent; locators and confidence are not fabricated; remote egress, destructive repair, and canonical research merge require explicit consent; capture logs do not leak secrets.
- Hooks and Git: lifecycle adapters add bounded context or status only; they do not own knowledge behavior, perform generic writes, or auto-commit. Checkpointing is explicit and limited to an operation's verified paths.
- Capabilities: each claim maps either to an executable behavioral verifier
or to an explicit no-verifier reason; reason-only capabilities are never
promoted to
verified. Unavailable optional dependencies degrade honestly; docs, manifests, code, and tests agree. - Release safety: the artifact is deterministic, allowlisted source plus explicitly reviewed static assets, contains no executable bytecode or runtime caches, is auditable locally, and remains unpublished; version and cross-file metadata agree.
- Regression quality: failure paths, symlink/path traversal, stale state, multi-vault isolation, concurrency, and rollback have hermetic coverage.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 90976a00b4ba
verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian (15,624 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,083 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
canvas-composer
Content strategist for canvas text nodes. Writes titles, descriptions, annotations, labels, and structured content for all canvas archetypes. Follows the 15-30 visible nodes per viewport principle. Content is scannable: headers, bullets, bold. Max 200 words per text node. Context: /canvas generate needs slide content…
canvas-layout
Spatial positioning specialist for Obsidian Canvas. Computes optimal node positions using layout algorithms (dagre, grid, radial, force-directed, linear). Preserves zone containment, snaps to 20px grid, refits groups. Dispatched for complex canvases with 30+ nodes requiring multi-zone layout or algorithm selection…
canvas-media
Media asset dispatcher for canvas generation. Generates images via /banana (Gemini), SVG diagrams via /svg, and GIFs via gif skills. Returns file paths for placement on canvas. Handles batch generation for multi-image canvases. Context: /canvas generate needs 4 AI images for a mood board assistant: Dispatches…
skill-reviewer
Fresh-context reviewer for Claude Ads skill and agent routing, progressive disclosure, prompt contracts, safety boundaries, examples, and runnable verification.
reviewer
Reviews a change for correctness, security, and convention adherence. Use AFTER a resolver edit and BEFORE merge. Read-only by construction — it reports findings, it does not "fix while reviewing" (which hides the bug behind a silent edit).
worker
Build worker on the routed model - writes code, edits files, executes specs. Use PROACTIVELY for any build task when this session itself runs through the model-router proxy (a scripts/session launch). In a normal direct-login session, do NOT use this agent - use the /fabsol flow's headless delegation instead, because…