dev-brownfield

A safety guide for implementing changes in an unfamiliar or poorly planned codebase. It adds structural checks when a story lacks risk context, meaning an assessment of likely change impact.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect the code related to a story, assess the impact of key functions, and stop implementation when a refactor should come first.
Why use it?
It catches high-risk changes before coding begins, especially when architecture analysis or sprint planning was skipped.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/clay-good/openlore/dev-brownfield
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clay-good/OpenLore
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 467 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00467
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00234
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00093
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00047

Measured 2d ago against content hash e72ce7c524c3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

dev-brownfield scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

examples/bmad/agents/dev-brownfield.md · 70 lines

What it actually says

Agent: Developer — No-Planning Fallback

Load this ONLY when:

  • No architect analysis was done and stories have no risk_context
  • Onboarding to a completely unknown codebase mid-project
  • The sprint planning task was skipped

In normal usage, bmad/tasks/implement-story.md is sufficient — the risk context from planning makes this override unnecessary.


What this adds

When risk_context is absent from a story, this override enforces a full structural gate at implementation time as a safety net.

For every story, before writing code:

  1. Call orient with the story description
  2. Call analyze_impact on the top 3 functions
  3. If any riskScore ≥ 70: stop, propose a refactor story, do not proceed

This replicates at dev time what should have happened at planning time.


When to stop using this

Once the Architect Agent has run bmad/tasks/onboarding.md and bmad/agents/architect.md, and stories have risk_context populated, remove this override. It adds cost (extra MCP calls) with no benefit once planning is done correctly.


Gate

<use_mcp_tool>
  <server_name>openlore</server_name>
  <tool_name>orient</tool_name>
  <arguments>{
    "directory": "$PROJECT_ROOT",
    "task": "$STORY_TITLE — $AC1",
    "limit": 7
  }</arguments>
</use_mcp_tool>

For each of the top 3 functions:

<use_mcp_tool>
  <server_name>openlore</server_name>
  <tool_name>analyze_impact</tool_name>
  <arguments>{
    "directory": "$PROJECT_ROOT",
    "symbol": "$FUNCTION_NAME",
    "depth": 2
  }</arguments>
</use_mcp_tool>
riskScore Action
< 40 Proceed
40–69 Proceed with care — protect listed callers
≥ 70 Stop — create refactor story, block this story
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 70 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e72ce7c524c3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

dev-brownfield is an agent published in the GitHub repository clay-good/OpenLore (290 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 467 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.