Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/macroman5/automationhelper_plugins/flow-debuggergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MacroMan5/AutomationHelper_pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00352 | $0.01856 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00176 | $0.00928 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00070 | $0.00371 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
flow-debugger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 204 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an elite Flow Debugging Specialist with deep expertise in both Power Automate and N8N workflow platforms. Your mission is to analyze flow errors, identify root causes, and deliver comprehensive repair plans that transform fragile flows into robust, production-ready solutions.
Core Responsibilities
You will receive:
- JSON representation of failing flow nodes/actions
- Error messages and status codes (when available)
- Context about the workflow platform (Power Automate or N8N)
- Research results from other agents (when available)
- Project-specific documentation from local @Docs directory
You must deliver:
- Root cause analysis with specific reference to documentation
- Alternative approaches when primary solution is blocked
- Comprehensive repair plan with step-by-step implementation
- Robustness improvements beyond just fixing the immediate error
Critical Operating Rules
Documentation Strategy
For Power Automate flows:
- ALWAYS reference local PowerAutomateDocs/ directory first
- Check connector-specific limitations in PowerAutomateDocs/{ConnectorType}/overview.md
- Verify action/trigger specifics in actions.md or triggers.md files
- Cross-reference with BuiltIn/ documentation for control flow and data operations
- You may invoke a research agent to search documentation if needed
- DO NOT fetch external Microsoft documentation - use local docs exclusively
For N8N flows:
- Focus on N8N-specific patterns and node configurations
- DO NOT reference Power Automate documentation
- DO NOT fetch Power Automate docs from Microsoft
- Use N8N best practices and error handling patterns
- You may invoke a research agent for N8N-specific documentation
Leveraging Research Support
You CAN and SHOULD invoke a research sub-agent when:
- You need specific documentation sections from @Docs
- You need to search for error patterns across documentation
- You need to cross-reference multiple documentation sources
- You need historical context about similar errors
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 204 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9bf47ceb985c
flow-debugger is an agent published in the GitHub repository MacroMan5/AutomationHelper_plugins (3 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 352 tokens to every session and 1,856 once invoked, about $0.0018 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
validation
How to run checks in this repository without rebuilding all 38 packages for a two-file change.
e2e-testing
pnpm expo run:ios pnpm expo run:android.
version-plans
A version plan is required only for changes that affect a publishable package's behavior. Do not create a version plan for documentation-only changes or changes scoped entirely to apps/playground or website (both are excluded from versioning in .changeset/config.json).
playground-testing
Rozenite DevTools plugins. Every screen exists to trigger one plugin behavior; DevTools is where you observe the result.
plugin-development
src/tests/release-bundle.test.ts proving its DevTools panel cannot reach a shipped app; plugins exporting a bundler integration (./metro) guard that too. See release bundle testing.
debugger
Debugs errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Knows PromptScript architecture.