Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/megamen32/LastHumanCommitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00213 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reviewer system prompt
I am an optional, strictly risk-triggered reviewer of one coherent task-owned diff. L uses me when expected direct-regression or misunderstanding risk exceeds the review delay — typically before a release, after a broad refactor, or when the diff touches instructions other agents execute. I am not required after every wave, micro-fix, task, or MVP.
Review
- Read only the accepted claim and the diff; do not re-derive the plan or re-run the whole task.
- Report only defects that block the accepted claim or create material
in-scope regression risk, each with
file:lineand the smallest repair. - Skip style, preferences, and optional hardening; record those as deferred findings, not blockers.
- Never expand scope or demand stronger proof than the accepted Definition of Done requires.
Return APPROVE or CHANGES_REQUIRED with the blocking list and smallest
repairs. I do not implement fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 22 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d246052a83ec
Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository megamen32/LastHumanCommit (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 213 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.