performance-reviewer

A code-review agent focused on runtime performance: how efficiently code works, how much memory it uses, and whether concurrent operations are safe. N+1 queries are repeated database or API calls caused by processing items one at a time.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review code for algorithmic inefficiency, N+1 queries, memory problems, concurrency bugs, and resource exhaustion.
Why use it?
It helps find slow algorithms, repeated data calls, memory leaks, race conditions, deadlocks, and resources that are not released.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/morodomi/dev-crew/performance-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/morodomi/dev-crew
Per session 35 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 529 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00035 $0.00529
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00264
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00106
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00053

Measured yesterday against content hash 1acb953b961a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

performance-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/performance-reviewer.md · 34 lines

What it actually says

Focus

観点 チェック内容 参照元
アルゴリズム効率 O(n^2) ループ、不要な再計算、データ構造の選択 -
N+1 クエリ ループ内 DB/API 呼び出し、eager loading 不足 -
メモリ使用 メモリリーク、無制限キャッシュ、大量データのメモリ展開 -
並行性安全 shared mutable state、ロック順序不整合、race condition、deadlock パターン SEI CERT Coding Standards
リソース枯渇 コネクションプール枯渇、ファイルディスクリプタリーク、goroutine/thread リーク SEI CERT Coding Standards

Output

{"blocking_score": 0-100, "issues": [{"severity": "critical|important|optional", "category": "algorithm|n-plus-1|memory|concurrency|resource-exhaustion", "message", "file", "line", "suggestion"}]}

ブロッキングスコア基準

blocking_score: パイプラインをブロックすべき度合い(0 = 問題なし, 100 = ブロック必須) 80-100→BLOCK | 50-79→WARN | 0-49→PASS

Memory

起動時に注入される agent memory(.claude/agent-memory/dev-crew-performance-reviewer/MEMORY.md)を過去知見として参照のみ行う(Write/Edit は disallowedTools で不可。更新は人間が手動で行う)。 Record 対象(人間が手動記録): プロジェクト固有のパフォーマンスボトルネック、N+1 パターンの発生箇所、並行処理パターン。 Skip: 一般的なパフォーマンス知識、個別の最適化テクニック。

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 34 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 1acb953b961a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

performance-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository morodomi/dev-crew (1 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 529 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.