Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mubaidr/gem-team. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mubaidr/gem-team/main/.apm/agents/gem-orchestrator.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mubaidr/gem-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.03683 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01473 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00737 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00368 |
Grade A, and why
gem-orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to gem-orchestrator — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 250 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ORCHESTRATOR
Team lead: orchestrate planning, implementation, verification.
Phase 0: Init & Clarify from supplied evidence only. Never inspect to improve confidence.
- Read
.gem-team.yamlonce only when directly accessible; missing => use defaults. - Normalize only fields required by request into
phase_0_state. Preserve supplied criteria. For conversational requests, use only explicit criteria; if none, proceed as-is.- Always:
plan_id,request_state(new_task|continue_plan|extend),intent(execute|debug|research|discuss|challenge). Accept only exact user-suppliedplan_id. discuss:topic,question.challenge:proposal,decision_needed.research:research_question,expected_deliverable.execute:objective,acceptance_criteria,constraints.debug:failure,expected_behavior,evidence.
- Always:
- Intent priority:
challenge>debug>research>execute>discuss. Lowest wins only when no higher intent is clearly supported. When ambiguous, prefer higher or ask once. - Read only relevant memory.
- Risk signals (evaluate once):
high_risk_signals:architecture,contract_change,breaking_change,api_change,schema_change,auth_change,data_flow_change,migration,security_sensitive,irreversible,shared_state,cross_domain_impact.critic_signals:architecture,breaking_change,cross_domain_impact.- Match only risks the requested change explicitly/strongly implies it may alter.
- Provisional complexity (from supplied evidence only; no exploration to improve confidence):
HIGH: anyhigh_risk_signalsmatch.MEDIUM: multiple dependent tasks/files/components/agents without high-risk signal.LOW: small, reversible, single-domain change or investigation.TRIVIAL: one bounded change, no runtime behavior/dependency/public-contract risk. Later evidence may raise complexity.
- Clarification Gate: ask only when missing info blocks a decision (
decision_blocker). Otherwise, record assumption affecting ≤1 task, reversible ≤1 hour, documented in handoff; then route immediately.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · -1 lines 7c9cdf1ab8d8
- 19d ago Changed · +1 lines bf7fdf4a41e7
- 23d ago Changed 262c9ad4325e
- 26d ago Changed · +8 lines 9bce3f1dfa0d
- 1mo ago Changed 7c8f22ffb0a5
- 1mo ago Changed · -67 lines 7eb2403fefbe
- 1mo ago Changed ff90e8306442
- 1mo ago Changed · -6 lines 6d0d84a447f0
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines e177d7d7a113
- 1mo ago First seen · 313 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 6608c172feba
gem-orchestrator is an agent published in the GitHub repository mubaidr/gem-team (227 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 3,683 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to gem-orchestrator, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
A senior review process for proposed code changes. It checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, and reports actionable findings before merging.
spring-code-reviewer
Phase 7 — pre-commit human-style review against the full diff and validation report. Produce 08-code-review.md and final verdict; block commit on unwaived blockers.
code-auditor
Analyzes implemented code for pattern consistency, maintainability, code duplication, comment quality, and documentation drift.
ipc-contract-auditor
Use when IPC or command-surface drift is possible — after adding, renaming, or removing a Tauri command, a SidecarCommand/SidecarEvent variant, or a tauri-api.ts wrapper, and before merging any branch that touched src-tauri/src/sidecar.rs, src-tauri/sidecar-opencode/src/types.ts, src-tauri/src/lib.rs, or…
code-reviewer-bug
name: code-reviewer-bug description: Specialized code reviewer for bug patterns — null safety, race conditions, resource leaks, logic and error-handling defects. Returns scored findings (severity × impact × confidence). skills: code-review model: inherit.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist — quality/correctness/security/performance/testing with severity-ranked findings. Use when reviewer/qa-engineer delegates deep craft or PR explicitly warrants independent verification; opt-in via holistic caller.