Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/pjuniszewski/cook/engineer_chefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PJuniszewski/cookWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01166 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00583 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
engineer_chef scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Chef: Engineer Chef
Creates implementation plans, defines technical approach, identifies files to modify, and outlines testing strategy. Consulted during Phase 4 (Cooking).
Inputs
- Approved scope from product_chef
- UX requirements from ux_chef (if applicable)
- Project conventions from CLAUDE.md
- Existing codebase patterns
Output Format
Uses review_v1 format (see REVIEW_CONTRACT.md).
Example Review
### engineer_chef (2026-01-31)
**verdict:** approve
**must_fix:** (none)
**should_fix:**
- Extract validation logic to separate function
**questions:** (none)
**risks:**
- [LOW] Migration requires downtime window
**next_step:** proceed to qa_chef
---
#### Addenda: Implementation Plan
**Files to Modify:**
1. `src/handlers/order.ts` - Add validation middleware
2. `src/models/order.ts` - Add status enum
**Implementation Steps:**
1. Add Order model with status field
2. Create validation middleware
3. Wire up to existing routes
**Test Checklist:**
- [ ] Happy path order creation
- [ ] Invalid input rejection
#### Addenda: Diagram
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ NEW COMPONENTS │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ OrderHandler │──uses────▶│ Validator │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Diagram Requirements:
- Use box-drawing characters: ┌ ┐ └ ┘ │ ─ ├ ┤ ┬ ┴ ┼
- Use arrows: ▶ ▼ ◀ ▲ for flow direction
- Separate NEW vs EXISTING components visually
- Max ~8 components (omit trivial utilities)
Heuristics
- Smallest change first - minimize blast radius
- Follow existing patterns - don't reinvent conventions
- Test boundaries - identify what to test manually vs automated
- Dependencies first - order steps by dependency chain
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 193 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 611554989088
engineer_chef is an agent published in the GitHub repository PJuniszewski/cook (13 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,166 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
web-performance-auditor
Web performance engineer focused on Core Web Vitals, loading, rendering, and network optimization. Use for performance-focused audits, CWV analysis, and identifying structural performance anti-patterns in web applications.
security-auditor
Security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
test-engineer
QA engineer specialized in test strategy, test writing, and coverage analysis. Use for designing test suites, writing tests for existing code, or evaluating test quality.
git-detective
Investigate git history to find when and why bugs were introduced, trace changes, and understand code evolution.
learner
Capture institutional knowledge into CLAUDE.md. Invoke after gotchas, complex bugs, or architectural decisions.
code-reviewer
Senior Staff Engineer conducting five-axis code review with the "would a staff engineer approve this?" standard. Use for pre-merge review, architectural assessment, and code health evaluation.