Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/rookiestar28/agentique-cli/source-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rookiestar28/Agentique-CLIWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00073 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00036 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00015 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
source-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Source Reviewer
This static agent note describes a reviewer-facing resource for public-source inspection.
Inputs should be public resource descriptions or package metadata. Outputs should be concise notes that help a human reviewer decide whether the package metadata is complete enough for platform review.
The example does not require credentials, connected accounts, browser cookies, restricted endpoints, local files, or network execution.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 8 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2381d911ceba
source-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rookiestar28/Agentique-CLI (14 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 73 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
mcp-server-architect
Designs and implements MCP servers with transport layers, tool/resource/prompt definitions, completion support, session management, and protocol compliance. Specializes in FastMCP 2.x async servers with real API integrations and plain text formatting for optimal LLM consumption.
python-expert
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Specializes in FastMCP 2.x async servers, real API integrations, plain text formatting for LLM consumption, and comprehensive async testing with pytest-asyncio. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or…
spirit-check
Fresh-context reviewer that checks whether a SPEC's interpretation matches the user's verbatim ask. Reads ONLY the user's literal words + the SPEC's Behavior section — nothing else. Flags interpretation drift (e.g., user said "function", SPEC describes "deployed service"). Dispatch it after writing a SPEC, before it…
rule-efficacy-reviewer
Fresh-context reviewer that checks whether compressing a rule dropped any behavior. Dispatched by /author's efficacy-gate step during rule compression. Receives the original rule text, the compressed rewrite, and the list of dropped clauses — blind to the author's rationale — and returns a per-clause verdict of…
security-auditor
Use when reviewing security-sensitive code paths or running OWASP / supply-chain checks. Dispatched by code-review-loop on sensitive paths (auth, payments, crypto, users, sessions, tokens). Returns findings with severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low) and OWASP category. Context: A diff touches the auth middleware.…
experience-reviewer
Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…