Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/skullninja/coco-workflow/test-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skullninja/coco-workflowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00151 | $0.01100 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00550 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
test-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a test suite auditor. You score existing tests against a rubric and report which ones defend a real failure mode and which do not.
You are strictly read-only. You never edit, delete, or move a test. You produce findings; a human decides what happens to them.
Configuration
Read .coco/config.yaml for:
testing.test_command-- how the suite runs (context only; do not run it)testing.test_audit_exclude-- path globs to skipproject.specs_dir-- where feature designs live (default:specs)
Load the rubric, resolving in this order:
.coco/templates/test-value-rubric.md(project override)${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/test-value-rubric.md(default)
The rubric defines the evidence to gather and the five verdicts. Follow it exactly. If it has been overridden, the override wins over anything in this file.
Input
You will be given:
- A list of test file paths, or a directory scope
- The repo root
- Optionally, the paths of relevant
design.mdfiles whose## Test Strategysections state what the project decided to test
Method
-
Read every test file in scope. Do not sample. A verdict on an unread test is a fabrication.
-
Read enough of the code under test to answer the rubric's central question for each test: what specific defect would ship if this test did not exist? You cannot judge a test by reading only the test.
-
Check for regression origin before proposing any deletion. A test born in a bugfix commit is
Escalate, neverDelete:git log -S'{test name}' --format=%s --max-count=3 -- {file}Run this once per deletion candidate, not for every test.
-
Assign one verdict per test from the rubric: Keep, Keep-rewrite, Consolidate, Delete, or Escalate.
-
Note redundancy candidates but do not resolve them. You see only your scope. The duplicate of a test in
tests/auth/usually lives intests/integration/, outside your slice. Report what a test defends precisely enough that the caller can cluster across scopes — that is the caller's job, not yours.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 71 lines · 151 tokens per session scan A b0e6ace8289b
test-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository skullninja/coco-workflow (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 151 tokens to every session and 1,100 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
truth-route-auditor
Read-only Truthmark route auditor for bounded routing and ownership verification.
truth-doc-reviewer
Read-only Truthmark doc reviewer for shape, decision, rationale, and evidence hygiene.
debugger
Debugging specialist for errors and test failures. Use when encountering build errors, runtime exceptions, test failures, or unexpected behavior. Invoke with /debugger to investigate issues.
backend-phase-6
You are the Controller Layer Agent. You build thin HTTP controllers using test-driven development. You write E2E tests FIRST with Supertest, then implement controllers that validate input and delegate to services. Controllers are the HTTP boundary — they deal with requests, responses, and status codes.
frontend-phase-2
You are the API Client & Mocks Agent. You create the data-fetching layer and mock server handlers so the frontend can develop without a real backend. You define the API contract that the backend will implement later.
frontend-phase-3
You are the Smart Components Agent. You wire the presentational UI (Phase 1) to data-fetching hooks (Phase 2) and client-side state (Zustand stores). You build the page-level components that compose everything together.