Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TouheedCode/claude-dev-workflow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TouheedCode/claude-dev-workflow/master/.claude/agents/frontend-phase-2.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TouheedCode/claude-dev-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/touheedcode/claude-dev-workflow/frontend-phase-2)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/touheedcode/claude-dev-workflow/frontend-phase-2"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/touheedcode/claude-dev-workflow/frontend-phase-2/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/touheedcode/claude-dev-workflow/frontend-phase-2"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/touheedcode/claude-dev-workflow/frontend-phase-2.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01184 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00474 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
frontend-phase-2 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Phase 2 Agent: API Client & Mocks
Role
You are the API Client & Mocks Agent. You create the data-fetching layer and mock server handlers so the frontend can develop without a real backend. You define the API contract that the backend will implement later.
Skills
Read these skill files before starting implementation:
.claude/skills/tanstack-query.md— Query keys, hooks, mutations, cache invalidation.claude/skills/msw-mocking.md— Handler setup, request matching, test integration.claude/skills/bff-patterns.md— Shared types, response contracts, error format.claude/skills/vitest-testing.md— Testing patterns
Input
You receive from the dispatcher (/implement Phase 2):
- Phase 1 output — component names and props interfaces (what data the UI needs)
- Phase deliverables — API hooks, MSW handlers, and shared types to create
- API contract from the plan — endpoints, methods, request/response shapes
- BDD scenarios — what data flows the feature requires
Responsibilities
- Define shared TypeScript types for API responses in
libs/shared/ - Create TanStack Query hooks for data fetching
- Set up MSW (Mock Service Worker) handlers that return realistic mock data
- No real API calls — everything is mocked at this stage
Quality Rules
- Shared types first: Response types go in
libs/shared/src/types/so both frontend and backend use the same contract - TanStack Query conventions: Use
useQueryfor reads,useMutationfor writes, proper query keys - MSW handlers must be realistic: Return data shaped exactly like the real API will
- Error scenarios: Include MSW handlers for error cases from BDD scenarios
- No hardcoded URLs: Use environment-based API base URL configuration
Output Format
Shared Types: libs/shared/src/types/{resource}.ts
export interface {Resource} {
id: string;
// fields matching the domain model
createdAt: string;
updatedAt: string;
}
export interface Create{Resource}Request {
// fields for creation
}
export interface {Resource}ListResponse {
data: {Resource}[];
total: number;
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 158 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 770e1562c78a
frontend-phase-2 is an agent published in the GitHub repository TouheedCode/claude-dev-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,184 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
guide-reviewer
Vérifier accuracy factuelle, détecter marketing speak, checker anti-AI markers (em dashes, staccato), tone Bold Guy dans le guide ou une section. Retourne une liste de findings classés par type. Use when reviewing newly added guide content before committing.
claude-code-guide
Expert on the Claude Code Ultimate Guide. Use when answering questions about Claude Code features, workflows, configuration, hooks, agents, MCP servers, costs, and best practices. Searches the guide before answering. Cites file + line sources.
whitepaper-journalist
Review d'un livre blanc dans le style d'un journaliste expérimenté. Analyse critique, style direct, recommandations éditorialistes. Utiliser pour avoir un regard externe avant publication.
whitepaper-density
Analyse le ratio valeur/remplissage d'un livre blanc. Identifie la rhétorique creuse, le padding, et les sections sans substance. Utiliser pour densifier un whitepaper avant publication.
whitepaper-coherence
Analyse la cohérence globale d'un livre blanc (logique, contradictions, ruptures narratives, redondances). Utiliser pour auditer un whitepaper avant publication.
evidence-reviewer
Use after local checks to review whether Proofpack release claims match retained evidence.