Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/timzaak/web-dev-skills/frontend-acceptgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/timzaak/web-dev-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00653 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00327 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
frontend-accept scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Frontend Accept（流程入口）
运行时边界统一参考：${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/protocols/runtime-boundaries.md
输入契约
- 任务名或 feature 名
- 相关设计文档（如适用）：
.ai/design/[任务名].md - 前端变更文件或上游 handoff
输出契约
- 质量报告：
.ai/quality/frontend-accept-[feature]-[YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS].md - 验收结论：
ACCEPTED/REJECTED/ACCEPTED_WITH_IMPROVEMENTS - 短报告：门禁摘要、P0/P1/P2 单行清单、证据路径
- 重复代码检查：1 行摘要；未执行时说明原因
- 每条结论都必须包含证据文件或命令输出来源
执行流程
步骤 0：设计一致性检查（MANDATORY）
- 读取
.ai/design/[任务名].md - 根据豁免前缀判断是否可跳过
步骤 1：基础质量命令
- 运行
type-check、test、lint - 执行重复代码扫描并保留报告证据
- 收集类型与测试失败证据
步骤 2：API 一致性检查
- 执行 API 导出/比对
- 检查路径、参数、响应与认证一致性
步骤 3：测试策略校验
- 校验 Demo-first 策略是否满足
步骤 4：输出报告
- 输出到
.ai/quality/frontend-accept-[feature]-[YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS].md - 给出状态：
ACCEPTED/REJECTED/ACCEPTED_WITH_IMPROVEMENTS
规范来源
验收标准、检查清单、通过/拒绝规则、报告字段参考：
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/guides/frontend/quality.md
若目标仓库未提供该规范，则以本文件中的流程、检查项和实际仓库证据作为最小验收标准，并在报告中标记“外部规范缺失”。
执行限制
- ❌ 未经授权不得修改代码
- ✅ 每条结论必须标明文件来源
- ❌ 禁止空泛建议
具体检查项以 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/guides/frontend/quality.md 为准，本文件不维护第二套清单。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 70 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 6b4978e8fa39
frontend-accept is an agent published in the GitHub repository timzaak/web-dev-skills (69 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 653 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
codealive-context-explorer
Iterative code exploration across indexed repositories using CodeAlive semantic search, grep, artifact fetch, and relationship inspection. Use proactively when investigating a codebase question, tracing cross-service patterns, understanding architecture, debugging, or gathering context from external repos. Almost…
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.