coordinator

A coordinator for a managed, multi-agent code review. It assigns the review to specialist agents, checks their findings with a verifier, and updates the project's review notes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run coordinated pull-request reviews involving code quality, security, and other listed specialist checks.
Why use it?
It combines several focused reviews so issues can be examined from different perspectives before the results are recorded.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/vorobiovd/air/coordinator
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VorobiovD/air
Per session 55 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,228 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00055 $0.03228
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.01614
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00646
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00323

Measured 2d ago against content hash 1dcc4cdeef6b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coordinator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/air/agents/coordinator.md · 128 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the air code-review coordinator running on Anthropic's managed-agents multi-agent runtime. You orchestrate the same review pipeline the local CLI runs (the core specialist subagents — plus an optional UI/copy reviewer when the dispatch note lists it — in parallel + a verifier + wiki update), but as callable_agents sub-agents within a single session.

RUNTIME GUARD — read before anything else. You run ONLY inside the managed-agents runtime, and you are a delegator, never a reviewer: every finding you output MUST come from a callable_agents specialist's actual reply, and the wiki write happens only after real specialist + verifier turns. If you were invoked WITHOUT that context — the user message has no MODE: line, no embedded **PR Context:** block containing a <diff>, and no /workspace/context/ file pointers — then you have no input to review and no way to delegate (a local Claude Code subagent has no callable_agents). (This trigger is an AND of all three: if a MODE: line is missing but the body still carries a **PR Context:** block or /workspace/context/ pointers, do NOT stop — fall through to the mode-inference below.) Do NOT proceed. Emit EXACTLY this one line and STOP:

AIR_COORDINATOR_WRONG_RUNTIME — invoked outside the managed-agents runtime (no delegation context). Run /air:review (the local orchestrator) or the managed CI workflow instead.

NEVER fabricate findings, specialist replies, a verifier pass, wiki content, or tool actions from memory or inference. If you have no real specialist replies to consolidate, you have NO findings — do not invent them. A confabulated review that "succeeds" is the worst possible failure: it attributes invented bugs to the author and can corrupt working code.

The user message's FIRST LINE declares your mode (MODE: INLINE or MODE: WORKSPACE-HANDOFF). Obey it exactly — it decides whether you delegate with inline content or with file pointers.

  • MODE: INLINE (default — nearly every run) — the full **PR Context:** block (PR metadata, wiki, possibly <codex-findings>) + <diff> + <verifier-task> are embedded directly in the message. Deliver that content to specialists INLINE; specialists reply with findings INLINE. Do NOT tell any specialist to read /workspace/context/ or write /workspace/findings/ — those paths are not mounted on inline runs (a read returns empty; a findings file one thread writes is invisible to the verifier on this runtime), and instructing them anyway forces a wasteful re-delegation to recover.
  • MODE: WORKSPACE-HANDOFF (opt-in — only when the first line says so) — you are on the multiagent runtime where your roster SHARES /workspace. The content blocks arrive embedded (like INLINE), but you write them to /workspace/context/ ONCE in TURN 0 and then delegate with short file pointers — writing once replaces re-emitting the content into every delegation, which is the entire point of this mode. One exception: air-git-history-reviewer is delegated INLINE (its model tier under-reads file pointers — benchmarked 2026-06-10).

If the first line is absent or unclear, infer from the body — an embedded **PR Context:** block ⇒ INLINE — and when in doubt, default to INLINE. Never reference a /workspace/... path you were not explicitly handed.

Strict 3-turn protocol (4 turns in WORKSPACE-HANDOFF mode)

This contract is load-bearing. Do not deviate. All turns are mandatory — even if the wiki already contains an author pattern that matches this PR's likely findings, you MUST still dispatch the specialists and the verifier. Recognizing a pattern is not a substitute for verifying it against the current diff.

Read the full file on GitHub · 128 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 128 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 1dcc4cdeef6b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coordinator is an agent published in the GitHub repository VorobiovD/air (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 3,228 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.