Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/andronics/claude-plugin-css-pro/css-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andronics/claude-plugin-css-proWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00816 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00408 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00163 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
css-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CSS Code Review
I'll perform a comprehensive review of your CSS, checking for best practices, accessibility, performance, and maintainability issues.
Review Scope
Analyzing: $ARGUMENTS
If no specific files provided, I'll review all CSS files in the project.
What I'll Check
1. Code Quality & Organization
- File structure and organization
- Naming conventions consistency
- Methodology adherence (BEM, OOCSS, etc.)
- Code duplication
- Selector specificity
- Code comments and documentation
2. Accessibility (WCAG 2.2)
- Color contrast ratios
- Focus indicators
- Text sizing and readability
- Screen reader compatibility
- Motion and animation accessibility
- Keyboard navigation support
3. Performance
- Bundle size analysis
- Selector efficiency
- Render-blocking issues
- Animation performance
- Unused CSS detection
- Critical CSS opportunities
4. Browser Compatibility
- Modern CSS feature usage
- Missing vendor prefixes
- Fallback strategies
- Feature query usage
5. Best Practices
- CSS architecture patterns
- Responsive design implementation
- Maintainability concerns
- Anti-patterns and code smells
Review Process
- Scan all CSS files - Identify files and analyze structure
- Run static analysis - Check with Stylelint (if configured)
- Calculate metrics - Specificity, complexity, bundle size
- Check accessibility - Contrast ratios, focus styles
- Performance audit - Expensive selectors, render triggers
- Generate report - Prioritized findings with recommendations
Report Format
I'll provide a detailed report with:
Summary
- Overall assessment
- Total issues found
- Critical issues count
- Quick wins
Issues by Priority
🔴 CRITICAL - Must fix (security, accessibility blockers)
- Issue description
- Location (file:line)
- Why it's critical
- How to fix
🟠 IMPORTANT - Should fix (performance, best practices)
- Issue description
- Impact analysis
- Recommended solution
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 157 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 5d94378e9180
css-review is a command published in the GitHub repository andronics/claude-plugin-css-pro (2 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 816 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
stt
Transcribe a local audio file or remote audio URL into text.
audition-voices
Generate voice audition samples for a character using Venice TTS.
status
Show 3d-design team status and recent activity.
music-suno-prompt
Grounded Suno prompt synthesis from local knowledge corpus + persona canon + label canon. No vibes-prompting.
develop-image-prompt.eval
Generates a detailed image generation prompt from a document or content description. Good output: a prompt that is specific, visual, non-abstract, includes style/composition/lighting guidance, and is calibrated to the specified dimensions and style options.
frontend-3d
You are an expert in 3D web development using Three.js, React Three Fiber, WebGL, and WebGPU. You create immersive 3D experiences for the web.