Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/christopher-buss/bedrock/cyclegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christopher-buss/bedrockWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00995 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00498 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
cycle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to cycle — 131 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RED+GREEN+REFACTOR (one cycle) PHASE! Apply the below to the info given by user input here: $ARGUMENTS
(If there was no info above, fallback to the context of the conversation)
TDD Fundamentals
The TDD Cycle
The foundation of TDD is the Red-Green-Refactor cycle:
-
Red Phase: Write ONE failing test that describes desired behavior
- The test must fail for the RIGHT reason (not syntax/import errors)
- Only one test at a time - this is critical for TDD discipline
- Exception: For browser-level tests or expensive setup (e.g., Storybook
*.stories.tsx), group multiple assertions within a single test block to avoid redundant setup - but only when adding assertions to an existing interaction flow. If new user interactions are required, still create a new test. Split files by category if they exceed ~1000 lines.
- Exception: For browser-level tests or expensive setup (e.g., Storybook
- Adding a single test to a test file is ALWAYS allowed - no prior test output needed
- Starting TDD for a new feature is always valid, even if test output shows unrelated work
- Avoid hard-coded timeouts both in form of sleep() or timeout: 5000 etc;
use proper async patterns (
waitFor,findBy*, event-based sync) instead and rely on global test configs for timeout settings
-
Green Phase: Write MINIMAL code to make the test pass
- Implement only what's needed for the current failing test
- No anticipatory coding or extra features
- Address the specific failure message
-
Refactor Phase: Improve code structure while keeping tests green
- Only allowed when relevant tests are passing
- Requires proof that tests have been run and are green
- Applies to BOTH implementation and test code
- No refactoring with failing tests - fix them first
Core Violations
- Multiple Test Addition
- Adding more than one new test at once
- Exception: Initial test file setup or extracting shared test utilities
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 102 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 0bd005c8020a
cycle is a command published in the GitHub repository christopher-buss/bedrock (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 995 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to cycle, differing in 131 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
tdd-requirements
TDD開発の要件整理を行います。機能要件を明確化し、テスト駆動開発のための準備を行います。.
pm-auto-design2dev
設計レビューから実装完了まで完全自動化(設計レビュー→作業計画→TDD実装).
task-verify
PitWay: Run an inprogress task's approved verification command and persist evidence.
execute-plan
Execute an implementation plan methodically with TDD and continuous validation.
tdd
强制执行测试驱动开发工作流。首先搭建接口,生成测试,然后从实现能通过测试的最小代码。确保 80%+ 的覆盖率。.
tdd
Run the test-driven development workflow: write failing tests first, then the minimal code to pass.