Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/educlopez/ui-craft/clarifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/educlopez/ui-craftWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00559 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
clarify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Clarify the copy in $ARGUMENTS. Load the ui-craft skill.
Default mode: critique, not edit. Return the copy diff in a Review Format table. Only apply changes if the user says "apply".
Checklist — walk the UI and flag every instance:
- Button labels — verb + object. "Send invite" > "Submit". "Delete project" > "Delete". Never "OK", "Submit", "Click here".
- Errors — inline, specific, actionable. "Email already in use — sign in or use another address." Never "Something went wrong."
- Empty states — one line explaining why empty + one CTA. "No projects yet. Create your first." not "It's empty here!"
- Form hints — below the field, persistent, not just validation-triggered. "Must include a number and a symbol" as helper text, not as an error after submit.
- Confirmation language — past tense, subject-first. "Project deleted." > "Successfully deleted project."
- Destructive actions — the noun lives in the button. "Delete {projectName}" > "Delete". The dialog confirms; the button commits.
- Case — sentence case by default. Title Case only for branded product names. Never ALL CAPS (exception: 11-13px category labels, already in SKILL.md).
- Voice — clear > clever. Active voice. Short sentences. Real words ("cancel" not "discontinue", "start" not "initiate").
Knob-agnostic — clarity is not tunable. Run the full checklist regardless of CRAFT_LEVEL.
References to read: references/copy.md (microcopy voice + patterns), references/accessibility.md (error message expectations for screen readers).
Output format — the Review Format table:
| Before | After | Why |
|---|
Prioritize by impact (errors and destructive actions first, then CTAs, then helper copy). End with a one-paragraph summary of the overall voice shift. If the user says "apply", edit the code and re-print the table with file paths.
Next step: /critique — copy changes shift hierarchy; re-read the surface after (rung 1).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 33 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 27c5170dc2bd
clarify is a command published in the GitHub repository educlopez/ui-craft (298 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 559 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
a11y-scan
Scan web application components for accessibility violations against WCAG guidelines.
describe
Describe a design based on screenshot/video.
typography
This command is a lookup + decision, not a multi-step build — it doesn't need its own workflow file. If the request grows into "and now build the page using this type system," hand off to page or redesign.
start-design-plan
Start collaborative design process with brainstorming and planning.
design-thinking
About 15–20 minutes of questions. You'll leave with.
new-feature
Start a complete feature development process from problem framing to DOD and wireframe.