Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/go1c/workflow-plugin/takegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Go1c/workflow-pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00403 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00201 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
take scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
调起 workflow-execute 技能承接下面的单。先判定执行模式（自持凭证直连，或无凭证由调度方代写——当前目录没有 .workflow 绑定时禁止靠全局 profile 兜底写数据）；读单按「正文 + 评论 + 附件 + 验收项」拉全，前置未满足就停下报告；开工前先梳理需求，把歧义与需要拍板的决策点连同建议一并摆出来讨论，全部有答复才现查 transitions 流转到进行中；干活阶段按讨论确认的拆分尽可能并行子 Agent（互斥所有权切分，子 Agent 不碰凭证与回写）；完成后按统一证据评论模板回写（遗留补单 → 附件 → 评论 → 流转状态，每步读回）：评论必带提交单号（Git commit / PR 或 SVN revision）、这次不做的 TODO 经确认补需求单并引用单号、流转以待验收优先（工作流无验收态才选已完成），再按交回格式汇报。
预设边界：只承接指定的单 —— 不建新单、不动别人的卡、不改原始描述、不验收自己的交付、不跳过讨论直接开工。
完成后的状态、证据评论、附件和依赖写回先进入本地 bundle，再由当前权限模式上传和读回；评论仍必须带提交单号，遗留项仍需补需求单并引用单号。
单号或派遣内容：
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 14 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 09124015efa9
take is a command published in the GitHub repository Go1c/workflow-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 403 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
design-review
Workflow recipe — review a design end-to-end, ending in measured numbers rather than adjectives, by chaining 4 skills.
setup-pm-skills
Onboard a new user — find out what they do, recommend the right bundles & top skills, and set up a project CONTEXT.md so every skill is tailored to them.
statusbar-style
Switch the status-bar style (classic / capsule / hairline).
validate-dependencies
Validate all task dependencies for issues.
everme-help
Print a concise EverMe plugin status + reference card.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).