everme-help

A command that prints a concise reference card for the EverMe plugin, including authentication, hooks, slash commands, and memory tools.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to view EverMe status information and instructions for recall, profile context, saving facts, and saving task histories.
Why use it?
It gives users one place to check how EverMe is configured and which memory operations are available.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/evermind-ai/everme/everme-help
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EverMind-AI/EverMe
Per session 11 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 236 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00011 $0.00236
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00118
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00047
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00024

Measured yesterday against content hash 0373b503c36f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

everme-help scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/claude-code/commands/everme-help.md · 32 lines

What it actually says

EverMe · help

Print the following block verbatim to the user:

EverMe for Claude Code
─────────────────────
Auth:      EVERME_API_KEY  (account emk_*) — recall-only mode
           EVERME_AGENT_TOKEN + EVERME_AGENT_ID — required for realtime writes
Gateway:   EVERME_API_BASE — defaults to https://api.everme.evermind.ai

Hooks:
  SessionStart      → loads the durable Profile snapshot
  UserPromptSubmit  → recalls relevant memories before each prompt
  Stop              → saves the last raw turn through /mem/agent-memory
  SessionEnd        → no persistence; Stop owns runtime writes

Slash:
  /recall <query>   — explicit search + summarize
  /everme-help      — this card

MCP tools:
  mem_search        — hybrid search across all memory buckets
  mem_context       — durable Profile snapshot only
  mem_save_fact     — save a durable user fact to the Profile path
  mem_save_turn     — save a reusable task trajectory
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 32 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 0373b503c36f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

everme-help is a command published in the GitHub repository EverMind-AI/EverMe (54 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 236 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.