Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/morpho-org/sdks/verify-dependency-vulnerabilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/morpho-org/sdksWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02388 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01194 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00239 |
Grade A, and why
verify-dependency-vulnerability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 275 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
verify-dependency-vulnerability
Verify if this codebase is affected by a dependency vulnerability (CVE, supply chain attack, compromised package, etc.).
Usage
/verify-dependency-vulnerability <CVE | advisory URL | package@version description>
Required Input
The user must provide:
- A CVE identifier (e.g., CVE-2025-55182)
- A URL to a security advisory, blog post, changelog, or any document containing vulnerability details
- A description of a supply chain attack or compromised package
Step 1: Gather Vulnerability Details
1a: Attempt to Fetch Vulnerability Information
If the user provided a URL or CVE identifier:
- Use WebFetch to retrieve the document
- If the fetch succeeds, extract:
- Affected packages: List all package names affected by this vulnerability
- Compromised versions: The exact version ranges that are vulnerable or compromised
- Safe versions: The EXACT list of safe/patched versions (not ranges)
1b: Handle Inaccessible Sources
If WebFetch fails for ANY reason, you MUST use AskUserQuestion to prompt the user:
The vulnerability source at [URL] could not be accessed or parsed.
Please provide the vulnerability details manually:
- Package names affected
- Safe versions for each package (list ALL safe versions, e.g., "15.0.5, 15.1.9, 15.2.6")
DO NOT proceed without this information. DO NOT guess or assume versions.
1c: Validate Extracted Information
After fetching or receiving manual input, confirm you have:
- At least one affected package name
- The specific safe versions (not just "upgrade to latest")
If the source only says "upgrade to latest" without specific versions, ask the user to provide the exact safe version numbers or check the package's GitHub releases/changelog.
Step 2: Understand the Safe Versions Structure
CRITICAL: Pay attention to how safe versions are listed. Many vulnerabilities are patched separately for each minor version line. For example:
15.0.5, 15.1.9, 15.2.6, 15.3.6, 15.4.8, 15.5.7means:- 15.0.x line: only 15.0.5+ is safe
- 15.1.x line: only 15.1.9+ is safe
- 15.5.x line: only 15.5.7+ is safe
- Version 15.5.5 is COMPROMISED even though 15.0.5 is safe
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 275 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d8cc5c69aae1
verify-dependency-vulnerability is a command published in the GitHub repository morpho-org/sdks (40 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,388 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other commands, from other repositories
triage
Triage a GitHub issue and present findings on validity, code locations, and optionally create a failing test or resolution plan.
find-issues
Find GitHub issues that a PR might fix.
upgrade-nodejs
This guide explains how to upgrade the Node.js version that Bun reports for compatibility with Node.js packages and native addons.
find-duplicate-prs
Find open PRs that may duplicate a given PR.
add
Scaffolds a feature into a Vendure project — a new plugin or a piece of an existing plugin.
migrate
Generates, runs or reverts TypeORM database migrations for a Vendure project.