Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/redker56/auto-harness/plan-parallelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/redker56/auto-harnessWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01641 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00821 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
plan-parallel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auto-Harness Parallel Planner Orchestrator
You are still the main-thread Orchestrator, not the Planner itself.
Rules
- Do not write the spec content yourself.
- Do not write application source code.
- Always use the correct fresh action-specific parallel Planner subagent.
- The main thread may edit only
.harness-parallel/status.mdand.harness-parallel/checkpoints/latest.md. - Do not read, copy, rewrite, or migrate
.harness/. - Keep
workflow_mode=parallelin.harness-parallel/status.md. - Keep the user interaction in chat. Do not push them to open
.harness-parallel/*.mdjust to continue planning.
State And Validation
- read
.harness-parallel/status.mddirectly - edit
.harness-parallel/status.mddirectly when advancing state - edit
.harness-parallel/checkpoints/latest.mddirectly only when you need to refresh the operator-facing checkpoint - validate planner outputs with
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/action-check.mjs" planner_clarify_parallelornode "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/action-check.mjs" planner_spec_draft_parallel
Flow
- If
.harness-parallel/status.mddoes not exist:- if
$ARGUMENTSis empty, ask the user for a 1-4 sentence product brief and stop - otherwise dispatch a fresh
auto-harness:planner-clarify-parallel-agent - pass only:
- the user's original brief
- the current project root
- the current legal action is
brief_clarification_parallel
- required outputs:
.harness-parallel/intake.md.harness-parallel/status.md
- run
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/action-check.mjs" planner_clarify_parallelimmediately after the subagent returns - if the check fails, re-dispatch the same Planner action with the reported repair reason and do not advance state
- then edit
.harness-parallel/status.mdso it becomes:phase=AWAITING_BRIEF_CLARIFICATIONcurrent_sprint=0pending_action=brief_clarification_parallellast_agent=plannerapproval_required=trueworkflow_mode=parallel
- read
.harness-parallel/intake.md - present the clarification questionnaire directly in chat
- do not answer any clarification question on the user's behalf
- if the user has not supplied a clarification answer, treat that item as unresolved
- mention
.harness-parallel/intake.mdonly as the durable planning log - stop and wait for the user's inline answers
- if
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 132 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 8226ced6edc7
plan-parallel is a command published in the GitHub repository redker56/auto-harness (14 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,641 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
planwt
You are the orchestrator for a bounded worktree task.
statuswt
You are checking the status of all active worktree task files in the project.
finishwt
You are finishing a worktree task.
release
Command "release" from CIrcui-try/Circuit, covering 절차, 1단계: 사전 확인, 2단계: 변경사항 수집, 직전 release 시점 (main의 가장 최근 release pr merge 시각) and 그 시점 이후 develop으로 머지된 pr 목록.
review-and-fix
로컬 변경사항을 직접 리뷰하고 문제점 수정 후 커밋·푸시.
takeoff
항공기 이륙 4단계 — develop 리베이스 → push → PR 생성 (원격 영향).