security-pass

A security review for code that handles untrusted input, logins, permissions, secrets, files, databases, shell commands, or network requests.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps check for injection, exposed credentials, missing authorization, unsafe file paths, weak input validation, cross-site scripting, leaked errors, and risky dependencies or outbound requests.
Why use it?
It catches common vulnerabilities before sensitive code is treated as complete.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/buildmoonshot/skillpacks/security-pass
Any agent
npx skills add buildmoonshot/skillpacks --skill security-pass
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/buildmoonshot/skillpacks

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 482 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00055 $0.00482
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00241
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00096
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00048

Measured 2d ago against content hash 747d10626ad0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-pass scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/engineering/expert/security-pass/SKILL.md · 31 lines

What it actually says

Security Pass

Before calling security-sensitive code done, review your own change like an attacker would. Most vulnerabilities are introduced by people who simply didn't look.

Run the checklist on what you changed

  • Injection. Any string concatenated into SQL, a shell command, HTML, or a query? Use parameterized queries / proper escaping / safe APIs — never string-build untrusted input into a command.
  • Secrets. No API keys, tokens, or passwords hardcoded or logged. Read them from env/secret storage. Don't echo secrets into error messages or logs.
  • Authorization. Does this endpoint/action check that this user is allowed to do it — not just that they're logged in? Watch for "authenticated but not authorized" (accessing other users' data by changing an ID).
  • Path / file handling. User-controlled paths validated against traversal (../)? Uploads constrained by type and size?
  • Input validation. Untrusted input validated and bounded before use? Don't trust client-side checks alone.
  • Output. User-controlled data rendered into HTML/templates is escaped (XSS)? Errors don't leak stack traces or internals to users?
  • Dependencies & SSRF. New outbound request to a user-supplied URL? Constrain it. New dependency? Note it for review.

How to report

State what you checked and what you found. If you spot a risk you didn't fully fix, flag it explicitly rather than letting it pass silently: "Note: the file upload doesn't yet limit size — add a cap before production."

Scope it

Review the change you made and what it touches — not the entire codebase. The goal is to not introduce a vulnerability, not to audit the whole app.

Why this matters

Security bugs are the most expensive class to fix because they're found by attackers, not tests. A two-minute self-review at the point of change catches the overwhelmingly common ones — injection, leaked secrets, missing authorization — before they ever ship.

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 31 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 747d10626ad0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-pass is a skill published in the GitHub repository buildmoonshot/skillpacks (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 482 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

bridge

Use when the user wants hyperflow's behavioral rules to apply outside the terminal CLI — in Claude Code Desktop, claude.ai web, or IDE extensions that don't load CLI plugins. Writes a managed doctrine block into the project's CLAUDE.md so autonomy + intent-routing + commit cadence + role separation + file-first rules…

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace · 126 tokens

fable-method

A step-by-step problem-solving loop (classify the ask, define done, gather evidence, decide, act surgically, verify by observation, report outcome-first). Use when the user says "/fable-method", "use the fable method", or "approach this like Fable", or proactively when starting any multi-step task that no…

Sahir619/fable-method · 105 tokens

fable-domain

Discuss a domain with the user, research it from real sources, then generate a trusted skill bundle for it - a step-by-step workflow with a flowchart, a domain adapter, a trap fixture, and a smoke eval. Use when the user says "/fable-domain ", "make a skill for ", "add a domain to the fable method", or "give a lesser…

Sahir619/fable-method · 115 tokens

writers-pattern

Add a new platform writer module in src/writers/ that generates and writes agent config files for a supported platform. Each writer exports a function that accepts a config interface, creates directories (rules/, skills/, mcp configs), writes files with proper formatting and frontmatter, and returns string[] of…

caliber-ai-org/ai-setup · 111 tokens

caliber-testing

Writes Vitest tests following project patterns: tests/ directories, vi.mock() for module mocking with vi.hoisted() for test-time factories, global LLM mock from src/test/setup.ts, environment variable save/restore in beforeEach/afterEach, vi.clearAllMocks() lifecycle, and test file organization. Use when user says…

caliber-ai-org/ai-setup · 113 tokens

llm-provider

Adds a new LLM provider implementing LLMProvider interface with call() and stream() methods. Integrates with provider factory in src/llm/index.ts, config detection in src/llm/config.ts, and error handling via tracking and recovery. Use when adding a new model backend, integrating a third-party LLM API, or extending…

caliber-ai-org/ai-setup · 100 tokens