security-scan

A static security checker for .NET applications. It reviews dependencies, secrets, source-code patterns, authentication settings, cross-origin rules, and data protection, then rates findings by severity.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before production, after dependency or configuration changes, or when preparing for a penetration test or investigating an incident.
Why use it?
It finds common security problems before release, while making clear that it is not a live attack or penetration test.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit/security-scan
Any agent
npx skills add codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill security-scan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 116 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,319 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00116 $0.01319
Opus 5 $0.00058 $0.00660
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00264
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00132

Measured 3d ago against content hash 868519246707, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/security-scan/SKILL.md · 122 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/security-scan — 6-Layer Security Pipeline

What

Runs a defense-in-depth static scan across 6 layers. A project with zero CVEs can still have hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, and missing auth — each layer catches a different vulnerability class. Findings map to the OWASP Top 10:2025 taxonomy and are rated Critical/High/Medium/Low by exploitability, impact, and exposure — a Critical SQL injection on a public endpoint outranks a Low info-disclosure on an admin page.

Detection patterns, OWASP mappings, remediation code, and the report template live in references/scan-layers.md — read it before executing.

Honesty rule: this is static analysis, not a penetration test. It catches known patterns but misses business-logic flaws, complex authorization bypasses, and runtime-only vulnerabilities. Every report states this.

When

  • Pre-release security gate — full scan, non-negotiable before production
  • "Security scan", "security audit", "find secrets", "CVE check", "OWASP"
  • After a dependency update (Layer 1), auth changes (Layer 4), config changes (Layer 2), or logging changes (Layer 6)
  • Pre-pentest preparation — fix static issues before paying for a pentest
  • Incident response and quarterly reviews

How

Step 1: Choose Layers

Scenario Layers
Pre-release gate / pentest prep / incident / quarterly All 6
After dependency update 1
New endpoint added 3, 4, 5
Auth system changes 4
Config file changes 2
Logging changes 6
Public API exposure 3, 4, 5
Internal-only service 1, 2, 3

Step 2: Execute the Layers

Read references/scan-layers.md for the detection patterns per layer. Delegate deep auth and secrets review to the security-auditor agent, pairing the authentication and configuration skills.

# Layer OWASP 2025 Method
1 Package vulnerabilities A03 Supply Chain dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive
2 Secrets detection Pattern scan over .cs/.json/.yml/.xml/.config
3 OWASP code patterns A05 Injection, A08 Integrity, A04 Crypto, A01 Access Control Source scan: raw SQL, Html.Raw, BinaryFormatter, MD5/SHA1, IDOR
4 Auth configuration A07 Authentication, A01 Access Control get_endpoint_map — every route's auth posture in one call; flag unmarked endpoints; then JWT validation settings
5 CORS policy A02 Misconfiguration Wildcard origins, credentials combos, method/header breadth
6 Data protection A04 Crypto, A09 Logging & Alerting PII in logs, over-broad responses, plaintext sensitive storage

Read the full file on GitHub · 122 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 122 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 868519246707

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-scan is a skill published in the GitHub repository codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit (689 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 1,319 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens