Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add doodledood/manifest-dev --skill review-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/doodledood/manifest-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/review-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/review-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.02172 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00869 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00434 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00217 |
Grade A, and why
review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
review-code — one dimension per invocation
Audit a change along one review dimension and report findings. Load only that dimension's reference.
Input
$ARGUMENTS carries the dimension plus optional scope, e.g. dimension=code-bugs or code-bugs src/foo.ts. A manifest gate's body activates this skill with the dimension under /do's selected evaluator; the gate names the dimension and this skill owns the threshold. If no dimension is given, list the available dimensions and ask which one — one invocation, one dimension.
Dimensions and thresholds
Load references/<dimension>.md for the requested dimension and follow it. Its standards are opinionated defaults: where a rule the user stated, in the session or a context file, or a convention the project states or documents (not a pattern its code merely repeats) differs, that rule governs, a change following it raises no finding, and the report names the rule applied — except a Critical finding on the ladder below, which is still reported, naming the rule that produced it. The threshold is the bar a change must clear to PASS on that dimension:
| Dimension | Reference | Role | Threshold (PASS requires) |
|---|---|---|---|
change-intent |
references/change-intent.md |
defect-finder | no LOW-or-higher findings |
code-bugs |
references/code-bugs.md |
defect-finder | no LOW-or-higher findings |
contracts |
references/contracts.md |
defect-finder | no LOW-or-higher findings |
type-safety |
references/type-safety.md |
defect-finder | no LOW-or-higher findings |
defect-class |
references/defect-class.md |
defect-finder | no LOW-or-higher findings |
operational-readiness |
references/operational-readiness.md |
advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings |
code-design |
references/code-design.md |
advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings |
code-maintainability |
references/code-maintainability.md |
advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings |
code-simplicity |
references/code-simplicity.md |
advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings |
code-testability |
references/code-testability.md |
advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings |
test-quality |
references/test-quality.md |
advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings |
docs |
references/docs.md |
advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings |
prose-value |
references/prose-value.md |
advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings |
context-file-adherence |
references/context-file-adherence.md |
advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings |
What ships with it
14 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/change-intent.md 13 KB
- references/code-bugs.md 12 KB
- references/code-design.md 20 KB
- references/code-maintainability.md 21 KB
- references/code-simplicity.md 9.8 KB
- references/code-testability.md 11 KB
- references/context-file-adherence.md 7.3 KB
- references/contracts.md 13 KB
- references/defect-class.md 6.3 KB
- references/docs.md 7.0 KB
- references/operational-readiness.md 6.6 KB
- references/prose-value.md 12 KB
- references/test-quality.md 13 KB
- references/type-safety.md 11 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed 29e8a03f181d
- 27d ago Changed 119a15f18c8b
- 1mo ago Changed 03b95c3450cf
- 1mo ago Changed · -2 tokens per session c7b57e392bb8
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A f10f15c87574
review-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository doodledood/manifest-dev (75 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 2,172 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
great_cto
Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.
opportunity-solution-tree
Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to customer opportunities, possible solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery Habits. Use when the team is unclear what to build next, when multiple opportunities compete, or before writing a…
skeptical-triage
Reusable 3-round self-challenge + arbiter pattern for filtering false positives from findings/verdicts. Use when the cost of a false-positive gate block exceeds the cost of 4 extra LLM turns.
anti-patterns
Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that greatcto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect (pre-impl), pm (planning), senior-dev (impl), l3-support (post-incident).
cost-model
Standardized cost-estimation framework for greatcto plans. Forces explicit LLM cost, infra cost, human-supervision time, and the (defensible) human-equivalent comparison. Output format is parsable by the board's /api/cost path — must follow exactly.
done-blocked
Reusable reporting contract for any agent that hands work back to the pipeline. Forces ONE of two terminal statuses (DONE or BLOCKED) with a specific evidence shape. Stops vague "probably finished" and "kind of stuck" verdicts.