review-code

A focused code-review process that checks one quality area at a time, such as bugs, design, tests, types, documentation, or operational readiness.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a code change for defects, maintainability, test quality, type safety, contracts, documentation, or another selected dimension.
Why use it?
It prevents broad, unfocused reviews by defining what to inspect and what a change must satisfy to pass.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/review-code
Any agent
npx skills add doodledood/manifest-dev --skill review-code
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/doodledood/manifest-dev

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 103 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,077 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00103 $0.02077
Opus 5 $0.00051 $0.01038
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00415
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00208

Measured 2d ago against content hash f10f15c87574, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

claude-plugins/manifest-dev/skills/review-code/SKILL.md · 102 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

review-code — one dimension per invocation

Audit a change along one review dimension and report findings. This skill is the single home for the quality reviewers that used to be separate agents; each dimension's detection content lives in its own reference file and loads only when requested (progressive disclosure).

Input

$ARGUMENTS carries the dimension plus optional scope, e.g. dimension=code-bugs or code-bugs src/foo.ts. A manifest gate's body activates this skill with the dimension under /do's selected evaluator; the gate names the dimension and this skill owns the threshold. If no dimension is given, list the available dimensions and ask which one — one invocation, one dimension.

Dimensions and thresholds

Load references/<dimension>.md for the requested dimension and follow it. The threshold is the bar a change must clear to PASS on that dimension:

Dimension Reference Role Threshold (PASS requires)
change-intent references/change-intent.md defect-finder no LOW-or-higher findings
code-bugs references/code-bugs.md defect-finder no LOW-or-higher findings
contracts references/contracts.md defect-finder no LOW-or-higher findings
type-safety references/type-safety.md defect-finder no LOW-or-higher findings
defect-class references/defect-class.md defect-finder no LOW-or-higher findings
operational-readiness references/operational-readiness.md advisory no MEDIUM-or-higher findings
code-design references/code-design.md advisory no MEDIUM-or-higher findings
code-maintainability references/code-maintainability.md advisory no MEDIUM-or-higher findings
code-simplicity references/code-simplicity.md advisory no MEDIUM-or-higher findings
code-testability references/code-testability.md advisory no MEDIUM-or-higher findings
test-quality references/test-quality.md advisory no MEDIUM-or-higher findings
docs references/docs.md advisory no MEDIUM-or-higher findings
prose-value references/prose-value.md advisory no MEDIUM-or-higher findings
context-file-adherence references/context-file-adherence.md advisory no MEDIUM-or-higher findings

Read the full file on GitHub · 102 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 102 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A f10f15c87574

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository doodledood/manifest-dev (72 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 2,077 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.