research

A structured research workflow for investigating a topic and producing a Markdown report. It gathers sources, rates their reliability, and supports quick, standard, or deep research.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for technical comparisons, market or competitor research, academic topics such as arXiv papers, and research inside a codebase. Reports are saved as Markdown files.
Why use it?
It helps avoid unsupported claims and incomplete research by defining questions, collecting multiple sources, checking gaps, and requiring source links.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ggombee/code-forge/research
Any agent
npx skills add ggombee/code-forge --skill research
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ggombee/code-forge

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 46 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 644 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00046 $0.00644
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00322
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00129
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00064

Measured 2d ago against content hash 9e95031cba5c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/research/SKILL.md · 78 lines

What it actually says

Research Skill

구조화된 팩트 기반 리서치 및 마크다운 리포트 생성


트리거

/research [topic] + 옵션 플래그:

  • --quick: 빠른 분석 (3-5 쿼리, 500-1000자)
  • (기본): 표준 분석 (5-10 쿼리, 1500-3000자)
  • --deep: 심층 조사 (10-15 쿼리, 3000-6000자, 반복 패스)

인자 없으면 즉시 주제 요청.


깊이별 기준

항목 Quick Standard Deep
쿼리 수 3-5 5-10 10-15
최소 출처 5 10 20+
리포트 길이 500-1000자 1500-3000자 3000-6000자
반복 패스 없음 없음 있음 (갭 분석)

주제 분류

유형 채널
기술 비교 WebSearch + GitHub
시장/트렌드 WebSearch + 크롤링
경쟁사 분석 WebSearch + GitHub
학술 주제 arXiv + 문서 페칭
내부 프로젝트 코드 탐색 + Grep

워크플로우

Phase 작업 필수
1. 파싱 도구 감지, 주제 분류 도구 가용성 확인
2. 전략 핵심 질문 3-5개 정의, 범위 설정 Sequential thinking
3. 수집 병렬 데이터 수집 (researcher, explorer) 최소 출처 수 준수
4. 갭 분석 (deep만) 누락 영역 2차 쿼리 Sequential thinking
5. 리포트 피라미드 원칙: 결론 → 상세 출처 URL 필수
6. 저장 .forge/research/[NN].topic_summary.md 파일 저장 필수

리포트 기준

  • 현재 연도 컨텍스트 포함
  • 모든 핵심 주장에 출처 URL 명시
  • 비교 시 증거 테이블 포함
  • 피라미드 원칙: 요약 → 상세

금지 사항

금지
출처 없는 주장
비교 증거 없이 비교 결론
출력 파일 저장 없이 종료
최소 출처 수 미달
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 78 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 9e95031cba5c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

research is a skill published in the GitHub repository ggombee/code-forge (13 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 644 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

credit-analysis

固收与信用分析:信用债评级、利差分析、违约风险评估、城投债研究、可转债定价与策略。.

HKUDS/Vibe-Trading · 36 tokens

correlation-regime

Correlation-regime detection and crisis attribution — edge-density regime states with hysteresis, causal (no look-ahead) smoothing, regime-aware exposure context, first-mover crisis attribution with honest NAME / MACRO / AMBIGUOUS / ABSTAIN verdicts, and a correlation-rewiring leaderboard that catches slow bleed-outs.

HKUDS/Vibe-Trading · 70 tokens

behavioral-finance

Behavioral finance applications: theories of overreaction and underreaction, behavioral explanations for momentum and reversal, investor sentiment cycles, cognitive-bias checklists, and debiasing quantitative strategies.

HKUDS/Vibe-Trading · 42 tokens

deep-company-series

Write a publication-grade 8-part deep-dive series on a single company (120k words total): cognitive reset / moat / profit engine / hidden assets / era variable (e.g. AI) / financials Buffett-style / management / valuation+redlines. The core IP is NOT writing but REVISING — a strict fact-check checklist catches…

HKUDS/Vibe-Trading · 160 tokens

earnings-revision

Earnings estimate revisions, guidance analysis, and post-earnings drift (PEAD) — track analyst consensus changes, earnings surprise patterns, and management guidance shifts for US/HK equities.

HKUDS/Vibe-Trading · 43 tokens

performance-attribution

Performance attribution analysis — Brinson sector/stock-selection attribution, factor alpha/beta decomposition, market-timing evaluation, and benchmark comparison framework.

HKUDS/Vibe-Trading · 32 tokens