Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ghabix/spinecodex/code-review-testingnpx skills add GhabiX/SpineCodex --skill code-review-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GhabiX/SpineCodexWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00122 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00061 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to code-review-testing — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
For agent changes prefer integration tests over unit tests. Integration tests are under core/suite and use test_codex to set up a test instance of codex.
Features that change the agent logic MUST add an integration test:
- Provide a list of major logic changes and user-facing behaviors that need to be tested.
If unit tests are needed, put them in a dedicated test file (*_tests.rs). Avoid test-only functions in the main implementation.
Check whether there are existing helpers to make tests more streamlined and readable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 15 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 7722784fda70
code-review-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository GhabiX/SpineCodex (126 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 122 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-review-testing, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
apm-usage
Activate when the user asks about APM (Agent Package Manager): installing, configuring, authoring, or troubleshooting AI-agent packages, dependencies, compilation, MCP servers, policy, or any apm CLI command.
clean-user-facing-text
Audit and finalize authorized natural-language text meant for readers: strip suspicious invisible Unicode, then rewrite prose while keeping facts, meaning, and the writer's voice. Use when the user asks to clean, humanize, polish, or finalize articles, manuscripts, reports, documentation, emails, product copy, UI…
sessions
Search and ask questions about coding agent session history across Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Use when asking what was worked on, what was tried before, how a problem was investigated across sessions, what happened recently, or any question about past agent sessions. Also use when the user references prior…
codex-autoresearch
Run autonomous, measurable experiments in a Git repository: change one hypothesis, verify a numeric metric, keep improvements, and revert failures. Use when the user wants Codex to keep iterating toward a numeric target in the foreground or as a detached background run. Do not use for ordinary one-shot coding…
map-review
Interactive 4-section code review using monitor, predictor, and evaluator agents plus the user and maintainer role reviewers on current changes. Use when reviewing a diff, PR, or staged work before merge. Do NOT use to plan or implement; use map-plan or map-efficient.
map-wayfind
Decision-frontier wayfinding: build and work a durable map of open design decisions BEFORE planning, for large or foggy efforts where /map-plan would force premature decomposition. Use when a task is too big or too vague to decompose — many unknowns, tangled decisions, or "I'm not even sure what to build yet" — and…