Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to HeeGyeong/ComposeSample. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HeeGyeong/ComposeSample/main/.claude/skills/qa-verify/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HeeGyeong/ComposeSampleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/heegyeong/composesample/qa-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heegyeong/composesample/qa-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heegyeong/composesample/qa-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heegyeong/composesample/qa-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heegyeong/composesample/qa-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.03322 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.01329 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00664 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00332 |
Grade A, and why
qa-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
qa-verify — 릴리즈 QA 감사 하네스 (GitHub)
릴리즈의 GitHub QA 이슈 목록 ↔ fix 커밋을 대조해, 수정 누락(NO_FIX)·불완전(INCOMPLETE)·증상 불일치(MISMATCH)를 빌드 배포 전에 검출하는 read-only 감사 하네스입니다. 릴리즈/빌드를 올리기 직전에 돌리는 것이 자연스러운 사용 시점입니다.
역할 경계: 이 하네스는 "각 이슈의 수정이 존재하고, 보고된 증상을 해결하는가"(이슈-수정 대응 여부)만 본다.
- diff 안의 새 버그/품질 문제 탐색은 하지 않는다 →
/code-review의 영역. - 같은 패턴의 전파 탐색은 하지 않는다 →
/find-similar-bugs의 영역. INCOMPLETE 이슈가 나오면 보고서에서/find-similar-bugs #NNNN실행을 권고만 한다 (자동 연쇄 실행 금지).
호출: /qa-verify [버전]
- 예:
/qa-verify v1.2.0 - 버전은 GitHub milestone 으로 매핑한다. 생략 시 현재 체크아웃된 git 태그/브랜치명에서 추출 → 그것도 모호하면 열린 milestone 목록을 보여주고 사용자에게 확인.
GitHub 매핑 규약 (ComposeSample 기준)
- 버전 = milestone. QA 이슈 = 해당 milestone +
qa(없으면bug) 라벨이 붙은 이슈.- 커밋 매핑 기준 ref =
main. ComposeSample 은 release 브랜치 없이 main 에 직접 커밋·푸시하므로 release 브랜치를 찾지 않는다.- 인증은
ghCLI 가 담당한다(토큰을 직접 다루지 않음). milestone/label 운영을 하지 않는 저장소라면 이 하네스는 감사할 이슈가 없어 빈 보고서를 낸다.
오케스트레이터 절차 (메인 루프가 따른다)
1. 버전 결정
$ARGUMENTS 의 버전(milestone 명) → 없으면 git describe --tags --abbrev=0 또는 git branch --show-current 에서 추출 → 그것도 모호하면 gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/milestones --jq '.[].title' 로 열린 milestone 을 보여주고 사용자에게 확인.
2. QA 이슈 수집 (인라인)
- 인증:
gh auth status로 로그인 상태를 확인한다. 인증돼 있지 않으면 즉시 중단하고gh auth login안내 (이슈 목록 없이는 진행 불가).ghCLI 가 없으면 설치 안내 후 중단. - 조회 (읽기 전용 — 이슈 생성/수정/코멘트/라벨 변경 등 쓰기 호출 절대 금지):
gh issue list --milestone "{version}" --label "qa" --state all \ --json number,title,body,labels,state --limit 100qa라벨 결과가 0건이면 라벨을bug로, 그래도 0건이면 라벨 없이 milestone 만으로 재시도하고 그 사실을 사용자에게 알린다. 100건 초과 시gh페이지네이션을 위해--limit을 올려 전부 수집한다. - 보안: 토큰 등 자격증명을 출력/로그/보고서에 노출하지 않는다 (gh 가 인증을 관리하므로 토큰을 직접 다루지 않지만, 혹시 노출되는 값이 있으면 마스킹).
3. 이슈↔커밋 매핑 (인라인)
이슈마다 git log --grep "#NNNN" --pretty="%H %s" origin/main (origin/main 이 없으면 현재 브랜치) 로 fix 커밋을 수집한다. (GitHub 의 squash-merge 메시지·일반 커밋 메시지의 #NNNN 참조를 잡는다.)
- 커밋 0건 이슈 →
NO_FIX로 즉시 분류 (에이전트 불필요 — 인라인 처리). - 커밋이 있는 이슈만 Workflow 로 넘긴다:
items = [{ issue:{number,title,body,labels,state}, commits:[{hash,subject}] }]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 161 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 853c9dabaa92
qa-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository HeeGyeong/ComposeSample (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 3,322 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.
github
GitHub via gh CLI: PRs, issues, reviews, repos, auth.
otto-drive-pr
PR mergeability, CI, and live preview.
voicestudio-maintainer
Triage GitHub issues, review contributor pull requests, diagnose CI, and prepare explicitly requested releases for VoiceStudio's Electron desktop app and Python backend. Use for repository maintenance work, not ordinary VoiceStudio audio generation.
release
Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release"…
release-pr-review
Review pass on an open release PR (release/ → main) — the step between git-wrapup and release-and-publish when a project releases in gated release PR mode. Reads the PR's commit range through the code-simplifier lens plus a correctness review, verifies whatever an automated reviewer left on the PR, lands fixes as…