Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/helderberto/agent-skills/create-pull-requestnpx skills add helderberto/agent-skills --skill create-pull-requestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/helderberto/agent-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00682 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00341 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
create-pull-request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 49 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Pull Request
Mode: $ARGUMENTS
If --draft is passed, create as draft PR.
Workflow
- Run in parallel:
git fetch origin && git remote show origin | grep 'HEAD branch' | cut -d' ' -f5(get base branch)git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD | grep -oE '[A-Z]+-[0-9]+'(extract ticket ID)- Search for PR template in order:
.github/pull_request_template.md,.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md,.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/(directory of templates),docs/pull_request_template.md,pull_request_template.md
- Run in parallel:
git diff HEADgit diff [base-branch]...HEAD --unified=0
- If a PR template was found, read it in full — it becomes the canonical structure for the PR body. Do not paraphrase or skip sections.
- Review ALL commits (not just latest)
- Ask the user (use AskUserQuestion when available; otherwise ask directly). Ask all at once where possible:
- Effort (required): how long the task took in hours (planning, reading, testing, all included)
- Changes (required): general overview of what was done
- Testing (optional): testing done that isn't visible in the diff
- Tricky parts (optional): anything hard, requiring multiple attempts, or non-obvious
- If template found, also surface any template-specific fields that can't be inferred from the diff (e.g. "Does this include breaking changes?", "What type of change is this?")
- Draft title and body:
- Title must match:
/^(build|chore|ci|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|revert|style|test)(\(.*\))?: .+$/ - If template found: use the template verbatim as the body base — fill every section/placeholder using diff + user answers; check applicable checkboxes; do NOT add sections not in the template; do NOT omit any template sections
- If no template: use Summary + Test plan
- Reference ticket ID in body if found (e.g.
Resolves TICKET-123) - Incorporate user's answers into description — don't just repeat the diff
- Title must match:
- In parallel:
- Create branch if needed
- Push with
-uif needed - Create PR with
gh pr createusing HEREDOC (add--draftif requested)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 49 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 543e7d8d7b70
create-pull-request is a skill published in the GitHub repository helderberto/agent-skills (13 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 682 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-and-quality
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
constraint-driven-development
Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or…
performance-optimization
Optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, queries, and databases. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement, when N+1 query patterns need fixing, or when profiling reveals bottlenecks.
api-and-interface-design
Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints, defining type contracts between modules, or establishing boundaries between frontend and backend.
code-simplification
Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now…