Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/addyosmani/agent-skills/code-simplificationnpx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill code-simplificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/addyosmani/agent-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00051 | $0.03000 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00600 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00300 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- code-simplification — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
- code-simplification — 100% identical, 14 lines differ
- code-simplification — 100% identical, 1 lines differ
- as-code-simplification — 100% identical, 11 lines differ
- code-simplification — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplification — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplification — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplification — 100% identical, 1 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 332 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Simplification
Inspired by the Claude Code Simplifier plugin. Adapted here as a model-agnostic, process-driven skill for any AI coding agent.
Overview
Simplify code by reducing complexity while preserving exact behavior. The goal is not fewer lines — it's code that is easier to read, understand, modify, and debug. Every simplification must pass a simple test: "Would a new team member understand this faster than the original?"
When to Use
- After a feature is working and tests pass, but the implementation feels heavier than it needs to be
- During code review when readability or complexity issues are flagged
- When you encounter deeply nested logic, long functions, or unclear names
- When refactoring code written under time pressure
- When consolidating related logic scattered across files
- After merging changes that introduced duplication or inconsistency
When NOT to use:
- Code is already clean and readable — don't simplify for the sake of it
- You don't understand what the code does yet — comprehend before you simplify
- The code is performance-critical and the "simpler" version would be measurably slower
- You're about to rewrite the module entirely — simplifying throwaway code wastes effort
The Five Principles
1. Preserve Behavior Exactly
Don't change what the code does — only how it expresses it. All inputs, outputs, side effects, error behavior, and edge cases must remain identical. If you're not sure a simplification preserves behavior, don't make it.
ASK BEFORE EVERY CHANGE:
→ Does this produce the same output for every input?
→ Does this maintain the same error behavior?
→ Does this preserve the same side effects and ordering?
→ Do all existing tests still pass without modification?
2. Follow Project Conventions
Simplification means making code more consistent with the codebase, not imposing external preferences. Before simplifying:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 332 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A f0c5ed754057
code-simplification is a skill published in the GitHub repository addyosmani/agent-skills (90,889 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 3,000 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-skill
Create new agent skills with proper structure, progressive disclosure, and bundled resources. Use when user wants to create, write, or build a new skill, or asks "make a skill for X". Don't use for benchmarking or optimizing a skill's triggering with evals (use skill-creator), or for one-off prose edits to an existing…
review
Orchestrated REVIEW phase — fan out parallel, read-only reviewers over a diff (scope-detected audit skills AND independent agent lenses), then consolidate into one severity-ranked verdict. Use for a full pre-ship review, "review/validate this PR", or "spawn agents to review". Don't use to implement fixes (use /build…
plan
Turn a spec into a multi-phase implementation plan using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use after /spec when a spec exists at .specs/specs/ .md, or when the user asks to break work into phases or slices. Don't use without a spec, or for single-file changes with obvious scope.
tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
create-adr
Record an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) — a 1–3 sentence note capturing what was decided and why. Use when user says "create an ADR", "record this decision", "/create-adr", or just decided something architecturally significant. Don't use for forward-looking specs (use /spec) or general repo conventions (use…
spec
Create a spec (PRD) through user interview, codebase exploration, and module design. Use when starting a feature with unclear requirements, when the user asks to spec or define what to build, or says "write a spec" or "write a PRD". Don't use when requirements are crisp and a plan already exists (use /plan or /build).